» Articles » PMID: 32770154

Bacterial Mock Communities As Standards for Reproducible Cytometric Microbiome Analysis

Overview
Journal Nat Protoc
Specialties Biology
Pathology
Science
Date 2020 Aug 10
PMID 32770154
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Flow cytometry has recently established itself as a tool to track short-term dynamics in microbial community assembly and link those dynamics with ecological parameters. However, instrumental configurations of commercial cytometers and variability introduced through differential handling of the cells and instruments frequently cause data set variability at the single-cell level. This is especially pronounced with microorganisms, which are in the lower range of optical resolution. Although alignment beads are valuable to generally minimize instrumental noise and align overall machine settings, an artificial microbial cytometric mock community (mCMC) is mandatory for validating lab workflows and enabling comparison of data between experiments, thus representing a necessary reference standard for the reproducible cytometric characterization of microbial communities, especially in long-term studies. In this study, the mock community consisted of two Gram-positive and two Gram-negative bacterial strains, which can be assembled with respective subsets of cells, including spores, in any selected ratio or concentration. The preparation of the four strains takes a maximum of 5 d, and the stains are storable with either PFA/ethanol fixation at -20 °C or drying at 4 °C for at least 6 months. Starting from this stock, an mCMC can be assembled within 1 h. Fluorescence staining methods are presented and representatively applied with two high-resolution cell sorters and three benchtop flow cytometers. Benchmarked data sets allow the use of bioinformatic evaluation procedures to decode community behavior or convey qualified cell sorting decisions for subsequent high-resolution sequencing or proteomic routines.

Citing Articles

Fast quantification of gut bacterial species in cocultures using flow cytometry and supervised classification.

van de Velde C, Joseph C, Biclot A, Huys G, Pinheiro V, Bernaerts K ISME Commun. 2023; 2(1):40.

PMID: 37938658 PMC: 9723706. DOI: 10.1038/s43705-022-00123-6.


Opportunities in optical and electrical single-cell technologies to study microbial ecosystems.

Mermans F, Mattelin V, Van den Eeckhoudt R, Garcia-Timermans C, Van Landuyt J, Guo Y Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1233705.

PMID: 37692384 PMC: 10486927. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1233705.


Development of an Automated Online Flow Cytometry Method to Quantify Cell Density and Fingerprint Bacterial Communities.

Lopez-Galvez J, Schiessl K, Besmer M, Bruckmann C, Harms H, Muller S Cells. 2023; 12(12).

PMID: 37371029 PMC: 10296507. DOI: 10.3390/cells12121559.


Automated flow cytometry as a tool to obtain a fine-grain picture of marine prokaryote community structure along an entire oceanographic cruise.

Pernice M, Gasol J Front Microbiol. 2023; 13:1064112.

PMID: 36687618 PMC: 9853387. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1064112.


Combining Flow Cytometry and Metagenomics Improves Recovery of Metagenome-Assembled Genomes in a Cell Culture from Activated Sludge.

Abdulkadir N, Saraiva J, Schattenberg F, Brizola Toscan R, Correa F, Harms H Microorganisms. 2023; 11(1).

PMID: 36677467 PMC: 9864227. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11010175.


References
1.
Muller S, Nebe-von-Caron G . Functional single-cell analyses: flow cytometry and cell sorting of microbial populations and communities. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010; 34(4):554-87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00214.x. View

2.
Gunther S, Faust K, Schumann J, Harms H, Raes J, Muller S . Species-sorting and mass-transfer paradigms control managed natural metacommunities. Environ Microbiol. 2016; 18(12):4862-4877. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.13402. View

3.
Liu Z, Cichocki N, Bonk F, Gunther S, Schattenberg F, Harms H . Ecological Stability Properties of Microbial Communities Assessed by Flow Cytometry. mSphere. 2018; 3(1). PMC: 5770544. DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00564-17. View

4.
Liu Z, Cichocki N, Hubschmann T, Suring C, Ofiteru I, Sloan W . Neutral mechanisms and niche differentiation in steady-state insular microbial communities revealed by single cell analysis. Environ Microbiol. 2018; 21(1):164-181. PMC: 7379589. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14437. View

5.
De Vrieze J, Boon N, Verstraete W . Taking the technical microbiome into the next decade. Environ Microbiol. 2018; 20(6):1991-2000. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14269. View