Mechanistic Insight into the Induction of Cellular Immune Responses by Encapsulated and Admixed Archaeosome-based Vaccine Formulations
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Archaeosomes are liposomes formulated using total polar lipids (TPLs) or semi-synthetic glycolipids derived from archaea. Conventional archaeosomes with entrapped antigen exhibit robust adjuvant activity as demonstrated by increased antigen-specific humoral and cell-mediated responses and enhanced protective immunity in various murine infection and cancer models. However, antigen entrapment efficiency can vary greatly resulting in antigen loss during formulation and variable antigen:lipid ratios. In order to circumvent this, we recently developed an admixed archaeosome formulation composed of a single semi-synthetic archaeal lipid (SLA, sulfated lactosylarchaeol) which can induce similarly robust adjuvant activity as an encapsulated formulation. Herein, we evaluate and compare the mechanisms involved in the induction of early innate and antigen-specific responses by both admixed (Adm) and encapsulated (Enc) SLA archaeosomes. We demonstrate that both archaeosome formulations result in increased immune cell infiltration, enhanced antigen retention at injection site and increased antigen uptake by antigen-presenting cells and other immune cell types, including neutrophils and monocytes following intramuscular injection to mice using ovalbumin as a model antigen. studies demonstrate SLA in either formulation is preferentially taken up by macrophages. Although the encapsulated formulation was better able to induce antigen-specific CD8 T cell activation by dendritic cells , both encapsulated and admixed formulations gave equivalently enhanced protection from tumor challenge when tested using a B16-OVA melanoma model. Despite some differences in the immunostimulatory profile relative to the SLA (Enc) formulation, SLA (Adm) induces strong immunogenicity and efficacy, while offering an ease of formulation.
Sulfated lactosyl archaeol (SLA) archaeosomes as a vaccine adjuvant.
Akache B, McCluskie M Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024; 20(1):2395081.
PMID: 39278862 PMC: 11404618. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2395081.
Akache B, Read A, Dudani R, Harrison B, Williams D, Deschatelets L Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(6).
PMID: 37376432 PMC: 10303064. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061043.
Jia Y, Agbayani G, Chandan V, Iqbal U, Dudani R, Qian H Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(11).
PMID: 36365110 PMC: 9697222. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14112291.
Chong P, Chang A, Yu A, Mammedova A Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(14).
PMID: 35886964 PMC: 9319432. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23147616.
Adjuvants: Engineering Protective Immune Responses in Human and Veterinary Vaccines.
Akache B, Stark F, Agbayani G, Renner T, McCluskie M Methods Mol Biol. 2021; 2412:179-231.
PMID: 34918246 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1892-9_9.