Alpha 2.0
Login Register
» Articles » PMID: 32748995

From Deficit to Dialogue in Science Communication: The Dialogue Communication Model Requires Additional Roles from Scientists

Overview
Journal EMBO Rep
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2020 Aug 5
PMID 32748995
Citations 26
Authors
Cathelijne M Reincke
Annelien L Bredenoord
Marc Hw van Mil
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The 'one-way' expert model of science communication is out of date. The new dialogue model requires from scientists more than just providing expert knowledge to the publics.

Citing Articles

Navigating chronic uncertainty: a theory synthesis for nursing communication in life-limiting illness.

Grant J, Johnson-Koenke R BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):654.

PMID: 39272056 PMC: 11401398. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02328-7.

The evolution and ongoing challenge of unproven cell-based interventions.

Brinsfield T, Pinson N, Levine A Stem Cells Transl Med. 2024; 13(9):851-858.

PMID: 39045646 PMC: 11386208. DOI: 10.1093/stcltm/szae050.

Governing with public engagement: an anticipatory approach to human genome editing.

Barlevy D, Juengst E, Kahn J, Moreno J, Lambert L, Charo A Sci Public Policy. 2024; 51(4):680-691.

PMID: 39035203 PMC: 11258878. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scae010.

Cognitive, affective, and behavioral engagement with science news predicted by the use of accessibility strategies in science-minded and general audiences.

Zimmerman I, Tal T, Baram-Tsabari A Public Underst Sci. 2024; 34(1):92-113.

PMID: 38853629 PMC: 11673317. DOI: 10.1177/09636625241252561.

Response of Unvaccinated US Adults to Official Information About the Pause in Use of the Johnson & Johnson-Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Mishra V, Dexter J J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e41559.

PMID: 38557597 PMC: 11019423. DOI: 10.2196/41559.

References
1.
Lane H, Bahan B . Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children: a review and reply from a Deaf-World perspective. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 119(4):297-313. DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)70070-1. View
2.
Nisbet M, Scheufele D . What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am J Bot. 2011; 96(10):1767-78. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900041. View
3.
Radstake M, van den Heuvel-Vromans E, Jeucken N, Dortmans K, Nelis A . Societal dialogue needs more than public engagement. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research. EMBO Rep. 2009; 10(4):313-7. PMC: 2672891. DOI: 10.1038/embor.2009.43. View
4.
Besley J, Dudo A, Yuan S . Scientists' views about communication objectives. Public Underst Sci. 2017; 27(6):708-730. DOI: 10.1177/0963662517728478. View
5.
Jasanoff S . Constitutional moments in governing science and technology. Sci Eng Ethics. 2011; 17(4):621-38. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9302-2. View