Mild Ovarian Stimulation for IVF is the Smartest Way Forward

Overview

Journal Reprod Biomed Online

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Reproductive Medicine

Date 2020 Aug 4

PMID 32741716

Citations 9

Authors

G Nargund

B C J M Fauser

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Now is the time to introduce new innovative assisted reproduction methods to implement accessible, affordable, and demonstrably successful advanced infertility services in resource-poor countries.

Ombelet W, Van Blerkom J, Boshoff G, Huyser C, Lopes F, Nargund G Hum Reprod Open. 2025; 2025(1):hoaf001.

PMID: 39935763 PMC: 11810638. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaf001.

Access to assisted reproductive technologies in sub-Saharan Africa: fertility professionals' views.

Whittaker A, Gerrits T, Hammarberg K, Manderson L Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2024; 32(1):2355790.

PMID: 38864373 PMC: 11172248. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2355790.

Protocol for improving the costs and outcomes of assistive reproductive technology fertility care pathways: a study using cost measurement and process mining.

Leusder M, van Elten H, Ahaus K, Hilders C, van Santbrink E BMJ Open. 2023; 13(6):e067792.

PMID: 37280027 PMC: 10254617. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067792.

Cumulative Live Birth Rate per Oocyte Aspiration in Artificial Reproduction Technology: A Retrospective Observational Study of the Association between Maternal Age and the Number of Oocytes Retrieved in an Indian Population.

Gunasheela D, Ashwini M, Appaneravanda L, Nayak H J Hum Reprod Sci. 2022; 15(3):284-292.

PMID: 36341006 PMC: 9635378. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_123_22.

Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes Between Fresh Embryo Transfer in a Natural IVF Cycle and IUI Cycle Among Infertile Young Women.

Gekka Y, Nakagawa K, Watanabe H, Kuroda K, Horikawa T, Takamizawa S J Reprod Infertil. 2022; 23(2):93-99.

PMID: 36043131 PMC: 9363904. DOI: 10.18502/jri.v23i2.8993..

References

. Comparison of pregnancy rates for poor responders using IVF with mild ovarian stimulation versus conventional IVF: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2018; 109(6):993-999. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.019. View

Sunkara S, La Marca A, Seed P, Khalaf Y . Increased risk of preterm birth and low birthweight with very high number of oocytes following IVF: an analysis of 65 868 singleton live birth outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(6):1473-80. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev076. View

Macklon N, Stouffer R, Giudice L, Fauser B . The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Endocr Rev. 2006; 27(2):170-207. DOI: 10.1210/er.2005-0015. View

Magnusson A, Kallen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Bergh C . The number of oocytes retrieved during IVF: a balance between efficacy and safety. Hum Reprod. 2017; 33(1):58-64. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex334. View

Fauser B . Towards the global coverage of a unified registry of IVF outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018; 38(2):133-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.001. View

Heijnen E, Eijkemans M, de Klerk C, Polinder S, Beckers N, Klinkert E . A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2007; 369(9563):743-749. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60360-2. View

Baker V, Brown M, Luke B, Smith G, Ireland J . Gonadotropin dose is negatively correlated with live birth rate: analysis of more than 650,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104(5):1145-52.e1-5. PMC: 4896751. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1151. View

Nyboe Andersen A, Nelson S, Fauser B, Garcia-Velasco J, Klein B, Arce J . Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial. Fertil Steril. 2016; 107(2):387-396.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.033. View

Datta A, Maheshwari A, Felix N, Campbell S, Nargund G . Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020; 41(2):225-238. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.03.005. View

10.

Pereira N, Elias R, Christos P, Petrini A, Hancock K, Lekovich J . Supraphysiologic estradiol is an independent predictor of low birth weight in full-term singletons born after fresh embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(7):1410-1417. PMC: 6251696. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex095. View

11.

Fernandez-Sanchez M, Visnova H, Yuzpe A, Klein B, Mannaerts B, Arce J . Individualization of the starting dose of follitropin delta reduces the overall OHSS risk and/or the need for additional preventive interventions: cumulative data over three stimulation cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 38(4):528-537. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.032. View

12.

Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves S, Humaidan P . Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2018; 25(1):2-14. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy033. View

13.

Liu S, Kuang Y, Wu Y, Feng Y, Lyu Q, Wang L . High oestradiol concentration after ovarian stimulation is associated with lower maternal serum beta-HCG concentration and neonatal birth weight. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 35(2):189-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.04.010. View

14.

Youssef M, van der Veen F, Al-Inany H, Mochtar M, Griesinger G, Mohesen M . Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (10):CD008046. PMC: 10767297. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008046.pub4. View

15.

McCulloh D, Alikani M, Norian J, Kolb B, Arbones J, Munne S . Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) parameters associated with euploidy rates in donor oocytes. Eur J Med Genet. 2019; 62(8):103707. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.103707. View

16.

Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka M, de Mouzon J, Erb K, Mocanu E . Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(10):1957-1973. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex264. View

17.

Zhang W, Ma Y, Xiong Y, Xiao X, Chen S, Wang X . Supraphysiological serum oestradiol negatively affects birthweight in cryopreserved embryo transfers: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 39(2):312-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.04.015. View

18.

Irani M, Canon C, Robles A, Maddy B, Gunnala V, Qin X . No effect of ovarian stimulation and oocyte yield on euploidy and live birth rates: an analysis of 12 298 trophectoderm biopsies. Hum Reprod. 2020; 35(5):1082-1089. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa028. View

19.

Vermey B, Chua S, Zafarmand M, Wang R, Longobardi S, Cottell E . Is there an association between oocyte number and embryo quality? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 39(5):751-763. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.06.013. View

20.

Baart E, Martini E, Eijkemans M, Van Opstal D, Beckers N, Verhoeff A . Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(4):980-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del484. View