» Articles » PMID: 32714179

Structural Covariance Network Disruption and Functional Compensation in Parkinson's Disease

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2020 Jul 28
PMID 32714179
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: To investigate the structural covariance network disruption in Parkinson's disease (PD), and explore the functional alterations of disrupted structural covariance network. : A cohort of 100 PD patients and 70 healthy participants underwent structural and functional magnetic resonance scanning. Independent component analysis (ICA) was applied separately to both deformation-based morphometry (DBM) maps and functional maps with the same calculating parameters (both decomposed into 20 independent components (ICs) and computed 20 times the Infomax algorithm in ICASSO). Disrupted structural covariance network in PD patients was identified, and then, we performed goodness of fit analysis to obtain the functional network that showed the highest spatial overlap with it. We investigated the relationship between structural covariance network and functional network alterations. Finally, to further understand the structural and functional alterations over time, we performed a longitudinal subgroup analysis (51 patients were followed up for 2 years) with the same procedures. : In a cross-sectional analysis, PD patients showed decreased structural covariance between anterior and posterior cingulate subnetworks. The functional components showed best overlap with anterior and posterior cingulate structural subnetworks were selected as anterior and posterior cingulate functional subnetworks. The functional connectivity between them was significantly increased [assessed by Functional Network Connectivity (FNC) toolbox]; and the increased functional connectivity was negatively correlated with cingulate structural covariance network integrity. Longitudinal subgroup analysis showed cingulate structural covariance network disruption was worse at follow-up, while the functional connectivity between anterior and posterior cingulate network was increased at baseline and decreased at follow-up. : This study indicated that the cingulate structural covariance network displayed a high susceptibility in PD patients. This study indicated that the cingulate structural covariance network displayed a high susceptibility in PD patients. Considering that disrupted structural covariance network coexisted with enhanced/remained functional activity during disease development, enhanced functional activity underlying the disrupted cingulate structural covariance network might represent a temporal compensation for maintaining clinical performance.

Citing Articles

Graph analysis based on SCN reveals novel neuroanatomical targets related to tinnitus distress.

Lu Y, Yang Y, Yan M, Sun L, Fu C, Zhang J Front Neurosci. 2025; 18():1417032.

PMID: 39840021 PMC: 11747764. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1417032.


Altered structural covariance of the cortex and hippocampal formation in patients with lung cancer after chemotherapy.

Liu R, Rong P, Ma Y, Lv P, Dong N, Chen W Heliyon. 2024; 10(22):e40284.

PMID: 39641051 PMC: 11617865. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40284.


Specific structural changes in Parkinson's disease-related olfactory dysfunction compared to others forms of olfactory dysfunction.

Brosse S, Tremblay C, Merida I, Frasnelli J Front Neural Circuits. 2024; 18:1503841.

PMID: 39606791 PMC: 11598501. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2024.1503841.


Deformation-based morphometry: a sensitive imaging approach to detect radiation-induced brain injury?.

Brunaud C, Valable S, Ropars G, Dwiri F, Naveau M, Toutain J Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):95.

PMID: 39026377 PMC: 11256482. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00736-1.


Structural underpinnings and long-term effects of resilience in Parkinson's disease.

Dzialas V, Hoenig M, Prange S, Bischof G, Drzezga A, van Eimeren T NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2024; 10(1):94.

PMID: 38697984 PMC: 11066097. DOI: 10.1038/s41531-024-00699-x.


References
1.
Chen B, Fan G, Liu H, Wang S . Changes in anatomical and functional connectivity of Parkinson's disease patients according to cognitive status. Eur J Radiol. 2015; 84(7):1318-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.04.014. View

2.
Himberg J, Hyvarinen A, Esposito F . Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization. Neuroimage. 2004; 22(3):1214-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.027. View

3.
Hou Y, Yang J, Luo C, Ou R, Zou Y, Song W . Resting-state network connectivity in cognitively unimpaired drug-naïve patients with rigidity-dominant Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2018; 395:147-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.10.003. View

4.
Hafkemeijer A, Moller C, Dopper E, Jiskoot L, van den Berg-Huysmans A, Van Swieten J . Differences in structural covariance brain networks between behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015; 37(3):978-88. PMC: 6867562. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23081. View

5.
Gorges M, Muller H, Lule D, Pinkhardt E, Ludolph A, Kassubek J . To rise and to fall: functional connectivity in cognitively normal and cognitively impaired patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2015; 36(4):1727-1735. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.12.026. View