Validating the Independent Components of Neuroimaging Time Series Via Clustering and Visualization
Overview
Affiliations
Recently, independent component analysis (ICA) has been widely used in the analysis of brain imaging data. An important problem with most ICA algorithms is, however, that they are stochastic; that is, their results may be somewhat different in different runs of the algorithm. Thus, the outputs of a single run of an ICA algorithm should be interpreted with some reserve, and further analysis of the algorithmic reliability of the components is needed. Moreover, as with any statistical method, the results are affected by the random sampling of the data, and some analysis of the statistical significance or reliability should be done as well. Here we present a method for assessing both the algorithmic and statistical reliability of estimated independent components. The method is based on running the ICA algorithm many times with slightly different conditions and visualizing the clustering structure of the obtained components in the signal space. In experiments with magnetoencephalographic (MEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, the method was able to show that expected components are reliable; furthermore, it pointed out components whose interpretation was not obvious but whose reliability should incite the experimenter to investigate the underlying technical or physical phenomena. The method is implemented in a software package called Icasso.
Dysregulated connectivity configuration of triple-network model in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Li H, Li B, Cao L, Jiang J, Chai S, Zhou H Mol Psychiatry. 2025; .
PMID: 39966625 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-025-02921-5.
Dev-Atlas: A reference atlas of functional brain networks for typically developing adolescents.
Doucet G, Goldsmith C, Myers K, Rice D, Ende G, Pavelka D Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025; 72:101523.
PMID: 39938145 PMC: 11870229. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101523.
Bakiaj R, Pantoja Munoz C, Bizzego A, Grecucci A Eur J Neurosci. 2025; 61(2):e16674.
PMID: 39844582 PMC: 11754945. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16674.
Lageman S, Jolly A, Sahi N, Prados F, Kanber B, Eshaghi A J Neurol. 2025; 272(2):142.
PMID: 39812878 PMC: 11735591. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12795-2.
The two sides of Phobos: Gray and white matter abnormalities in phobic individuals.
Grecucci A, Scarano A, Fumero A, Rivero F, Marrero R, Olivares T Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025; 25(2):550-569.
PMID: 39753800 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-024-01258-w.