» Articles » PMID: 32706655

Implementation Strategies for Web-Based Apps for Screening: Scoping Review

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2020 Jul 25
PMID 32706655
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Screening is an effective primary prevention strategy in health care, as it enables the early detection of diseases. However, the uptake of such screening remains low. Different delivery methods for screening have been developed and found to be effective in increasing the uptake of screening, including the use of web-based apps. Studies have shown that web-based apps for screening are effective in increasing the uptake of health screening among the general population. However, not much is known about the effective implementation of such web-based apps in the real-world setting. Implementation strategies are theory-based methods or techniques used to enhance the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of evidence-based interventions. Implementation strategies are important, as they allow us to understand how to implement an evidence-based intervention. Therefore, a scoping review to identify the various implementation strategies for web-based apps for screening is warranted.

Objective: This scoping review aims to identify (1) strategies used to implement web-based apps for health screening, (2) frameworks used for implementing web-based apps for health screening, (3) outcome measures of implementation strategies, and (4) effective implementation strategies.

Methods: This scoping review was conducted based on Arksey and O'Malley's framework. After identifying the review question, two researchers independently screened and selected relevant literature from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry, OpenGrey, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Web of Science. This was followed by charting the data using a standardized form. Finally, we collated, summarized, and reported the results quantitatively and qualitatively based on the review objectives.

Results: A total of 16,476 studies were retrieved, of which 5669 were duplicates. From a total of 10,807 studies, 10,784 studies were excluded based on their titles and abstracts. There were 23 full-text articles reviewed, and 4 articles were included in the final analysis. Many studies were excluded because they focused on the effectiveness and not on the implementation of web-based apps. Facilitation was the most cited implementation strategy used, followed by reminders, clinical champions, and educational meetings and materials. Only 2 studies used implementation frameworks to guide the evaluation of their studies. Common outcome measures for implementation strategies were feasibility, fidelity, and penetration. Implementation strategies reported to be effective were quality improvement meetings, facilitation, educational meetings, and clinical champions.

Conclusions: There is a dearth of literature on the implementation of web-based apps for health screening. Implementation strategies were developed without any reported use of implementation theories or frameworks in most studies. More research on the development and evaluation of web-based screening app implementations is needed.

Citing Articles

An Online Preoperative Screening Tool to Optimize Care for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: A Mixed-Method Study Protocol.

Petridis A, Koh C, Solomon M, Karunaratne S, Alexander K, Hirst N Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075708 PMC: 11899389. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050861.


Pilot implementation study of a web-based men's health screening app in primary care during COVID-19: a mixed-methods approach.

Ooi C, Jenn Ng C, Sales A, Hai Teo C BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1219.

PMID: 39394132 PMC: 11468301. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11702-9.


Family member and service provider experiences and perspectives of a digital surveillance and service navigation approach in multicultural context: a qualitative study in identifying the barriers and enablers to Watch Me Grow-Electronic (WMG-E)....

Barr K, Hawker P, Winata T, Wang S, Smead M, Ignatius H BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):978.

PMID: 39180037 PMC: 11344394. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11397-y.


Improving Patient-Centered Dementia Screening for General, Multicultural Population and Persons with Disabilities from Primary Care Professionals with a Web-Based App.

Sagiadinou M, Vlamos P, Exarchos T, Vlachakis D, Kostopoulou C Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023; 1424:265-272.

PMID: 37486503 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-31982-2_30.


Web-Based Risk Prediction Tool for an Individual's Risk of HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections Using Machine Learning Algorithms: Development and External Validation Study.

Xu X, Yu Z, Ge Z, Chow E, Bao Y, Ong J J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(8):e37850.

PMID: 36006685 PMC: 9459839. DOI: 10.2196/37850.


References
1.
Bailey J, Murray E, Rait G, Mercer C, Morris R, Peacock R . Interactive computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (9):CD006483. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006483.pub2. View

2.
Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, Towler B, Irwig L . Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103(6):1541-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01875.x. View

3.
Tabak R, Khoong E, Chambers D, Brownson R . Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43(3):337-50. PMC: 3592983. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024. View

4.
Elbert N, van Os-Medendorp H, van Renselaar W, Ekeland A, Roijen L, Raat H . Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ehealth interventions in somatic diseases: a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(4):e110. PMC: 4019777. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2790. View

5.
Proctor E, Powell B, McMillen J . Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:139. PMC: 3882890. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139. View