» Articles » PMID: 32698812

Protocol: Examining the Effectiveness of an Adaptive Implementation Intervention to Improve Uptake of the VA Suicide Risk Identification Strategy: a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial

Overview
Journal Implement Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Jul 24
PMID 32698812
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In 2018, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) mandated implementation of a national suicide risk identification strategy (Risk ID). The goal of Risk ID is to improve the detection and management of suicide risk by standardizing suicide risk screening and evaluation enterprise-wide. In order to ensure continuous quality improvement (QI), ongoing evaluation and targeted interventions to improve implementation of Risk ID are needed. Moreover, given that facilities will vary with respect to implementation needs and barriers, the dose and type of intervention needed may vary across facilities. Thus, the objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of an adaptive implementation strategy to improve the uptake of suicide risk screening and evaluation in VHA ambulatory care settings. In addition, this study will examine specific factors that may impact the uptake of suicide risk screening and evaluation and the adoption of different implementation strategies. This protocol describes the stepped implementation approach and proposed evaluation plan.

Methods: Using a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) design, two evidence-based implementation strategies will be evaluated: (1) audit and feedback (A&F); (2) A&F plus external facilitation (A&F + EF). Implementation outcomes of interest include uptake of secondary suicide risk screening and uptake of comprehensive suicide risk evaluation (stages 2 and 3 of Risk ID). Secondary outcomes include rates of other clinical outcomes (i.e., safety planning) and organizational factors that may impact Risk ID implementation (i.e., leadership climate and leadership support).

Discussion: This national QI study will use a SMART design to evaluate whether an adaptive implementation strategy is effective in improving uptake of a mandated VHA-wide suicide risk screening and evaluation initiative. If this study finds that the proposed stepped implementation strategy is effective at increasing uptake and maintaining performance improvements, this approach may be used as an overarching QI strategy for other national suicide prevention programs.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04243330 . Registered 28 January 2020.

Citing Articles

Combined use of the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework with other implementation frameworks: a systematic review.

Hunter S, Morgillo S, Kim B, Bergstrom A, Ehrenberg A, Eldh A Implement Sci Commun. 2025; 6(1):25.

PMID: 40051001 PMC: 11887334. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-025-00704-1.


Factors associated with a lack of health care utilization among Veterans after a positive suicide screen in the emergency department.

Laliberte A, Salvi A, Hooker E, Roth B, Handley R, Carlson K Acad Emerg Med. 2023; 30(4):321-330.

PMID: 36786953 PMC: 11081519. DOI: 10.1111/acem.14695.


Continuing the transformation: charting the path for the future delivery of Veteran emergency care.

Ward M, Kessler C, Abel E, Ahern J, Bravata D Acad Emerg Med. 2023; 30(4):232-239.

PMID: 36692104 PMC: 11135051. DOI: 10.1111/acem.14670.


Assessment of Rates of Suicide Risk Screening and Prevalence of Positive Screening Results Among US Veterans After Implementation of the Veterans Affairs Suicide Risk Identification Strategy.

Bahraini N, Brenner L, Barry C, Hostetter T, Keusch J, Post E JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(10):e2022531.

PMID: 33084900 PMC: 7578771. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22531.

References
1.
Gairin I, House A, Owens D . Attendance at the accident and emergency department in the year before suicide: retrospective study. Br J Psychiatry. 2003; 183:28-33. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.183.1.28. View

2.
Ray M, Wilson M, Wandersman A, Meyers D, Katz J . Using a training-of-trainers approach and proactive technical assistance to bring evidence based programs to scale: an operationalization of the interactive systems framework's support system. Am J Community Psychol. 2012; 50(3-4):415-27. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-012-9526-6. View

3.
Denneson L, Kovas A, Britton P, Kaplan M, McFarland B, Dobscha S . Suicide Risk Documented During Veterans' Last Veterans Affairs Health Care Contacts Prior to Suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2016; 46(3):363-74. DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12226. View

4.
Gould N, Lorencatto F, Stanworth S, Michie S, Prior M, Glidewell L . Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice: an intervention development protocol. Implement Sci. 2014; 9:92. PMC: 4243714. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0092-1. View

5.
Ivers N, Sales A, Colquhoun H, Michie S, Foy R, Francis J . No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implement Sci. 2014; 9:14. PMC: 3896824. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-14. View