» Articles » PMID: 32684797

Fertilizer Response and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in African Smallholder Maize Farms

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2020 Jul 21
PMID 32684797
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Improving fertilizer recommendations for farmers is essential to increase food security in smallholder landscapes. Currently, blanket recommendations are provided across agro-ecological zones, although fertilizer response and nutrient use efficiency by maize crop are spatially variable. We aimed to identify factors that could help to refine fertilizer recommendation by analyzing the variability in fertilizer response (FR) and the agronomic nitrogen use efficiency (N-AE). A literature search for on-farm studies across Kenya and Sub-Sahara Africa (SSA), excluding Kenya, yielded 71 publications. The variability in FR was studied using a meta-analysis whereas key factors that influence FR and N-AE were studied with linear regression models. On average, the FR was 2, but it varied considerably from 1 to 28.5 (excluding outliers). In SSA, 18% of the plots were non-responsive plots with an FR < 1. The main factors affecting N-AE for Kenya were P-Olsen, silt content, soil pH, clay and rainfall, whereas only soil pH, exchangeable K and texture were important for SSA. However, our study indicates that available data on soil, climate and management factors could explain only a small part (< 33%) of the variation in FR and N-AE. Soil pH, P-Olsen, silt content, and rainfall had significant but low levels of power in explaining variation in FR and N-AE. Our findings indicate that strategies to refine fertilizer recommendation should include information on soil types and soil properties.

Citing Articles

Root-associated bacterial communities and root metabolite composition are linked to nitrogen use efficiency in sorghum.

Chai Y, Qi Y, Goren E, Chiniquy D, Sheflin A, Tringe S mSystems. 2023; 9(1):e0119023.

PMID: 38132569 PMC: 10804983. DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01190-23.


Regulatory Mechanisms of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Plant Nutrition against Abiotic Stresses in Brassicaceae Family.

Jalal A, Oliveira C, Galindo F, Rosa P, Gato I, de Lima B Life (Basel). 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36676160 PMC: 9860783. DOI: 10.3390/life13010211.


Use of Organic Materials to Limit the Potential Negative Effect of Nitrogen on Maize in Different Soils.

Brodowska M, Wyszkowski M, Kordala N Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(16).

PMID: 36013897 PMC: 9415931. DOI: 10.3390/ma15165755.


Spatial approach for diagnosis of yield-limiting nutrients in smallholder agroecosystem landscape using population-based farm survey data.

Ichami S, Karuku G, Sila A, Ayuke F, Shepherd K PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0262754.

PMID: 35108304 PMC: 8809601. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262754.


Agronomic and financial benefits of direct Minjingu phosphate rock use in acidic humic nitisols of Upper Eastern Kenya.

Ndeleko-Barasa E, Mucheru-Muna M, Ngetich K Heliyon. 2021; 7(11):e08332.

PMID: 34825074 PMC: 8605198. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08332.


References
1.
Hengl T, B M Heuvelink G, Kempen B, Leenaars J, Walsh M, Shepherd K . Mapping Soil Properties of Africa at 250 m Resolution: Random Forests Significantly Improve Current Predictions. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0125814. PMC: 4482144. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125814. View

2.
Thornton A, Lee P . Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53(2):207-16. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00161-4. View

3.
Huedo-Medina T, Sanchez-Meca J, Marin-Martinez F, Botella J . Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?. Psychol Methods. 2006; 11(2):193-206. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193. View

4.
Ishak K, Platt R, Joseph L, Hanley J . Impact of approximating or ignoring within-study covariances in multivariate meta-analyses. Stat Med. 2007; 27(5):670-86. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2913. View

5.
Luo Y, Hui D, Zhang D . Elevated CO2 stimulates net accumulations of carbon and nitrogen in land ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Ecology. 2006; 87(1):53-63. DOI: 10.1890/04-1724. View