» Articles » PMID: 32671861

Interindividual Variation in Source-Specific Doses is a Determinant of Health Impacts of Combined Chemical Exposures

Overview
Journal Risk Anal
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Jul 17
PMID 32671861
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

All individuals are exposed to multiple chemicals from multiple sources. These combined exposures are a concern because they may cause adverse effects that would not occur from an exposure recieved from any single source. Studies of combined chemical exposures, however, have found that the risks posed by such combined exposures are almost always driven by exposures from a few chemicals and sources and frequently by a single chemical from a single source. Here, a series of computer simulations of combined exposures are used to investigate when multiple sources of chemicals drive the largest risks in a population and when a single chemical from a single source is responsible for the largest risks. The analysis found that combined exposures drive the largest risks when the interindividual variation of source-specific doses is small, moderate-to-high correlations occur between the source-specific doses, and the number of sources affecting an individual varies across individuals. These findings can be used to identify sources with the greatest potential to cause combined exposures of concern.

Citing Articles

A Machine-Learning-Driven Pathophysiology-Based New Approach Method for the Dose-Dependent Assessment of Hazardous Chemical Mixtures and Experimental Validations.

Limbu S, Glasgow E, Block T, Dakshanamurthy S Toxics. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39058133 PMC: 11281031. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12070481.


Opportunities and challenges related to saturation of toxicokinetic processes: Implications for risk assessment.

Tan Y, Barton H, Boobis A, Brunner R, Clewell H, Cope R Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021; 127:105070.

PMID: 34718074 PMC: 9229944. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105070.

References
1.
Kennedy E, Wilson L . MODUS OPERANDI OF THRESHOLD LIMITS COMMITTEE OF ACGIH. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1964; 25:589-94. DOI: 10.1080/00028896409342648. View

2.
Martin O, Martin S, Kortenkamp A . Dispelling urban myths about default uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment--sufficient protection against mixture effects?. Environ Health. 2013; 12(1):53. PMC: 3708776. DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-53. View

3.
Han X, Price P . Applying the maximum cumulative ratio methodology to biomonitoring data on dioxin-like compounds in the general public and two occupationally exposed populations. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012; 23(4):343-9. DOI: 10.1038/jes.2012.74. View

4.
Varshavsky J, Morello-Frosch R, Woodruff T, Zota A . Dietary sources of cumulative phthalates exposure among the U.S. general population in NHANES 2005-2014. Environ Int. 2018; 115:417-429. PMC: 5970069. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.02.029. View

5.
Han X, Price P . Determining the maximum cumulative ratios for mixtures observed in ground water wells used as drinking water supplies in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012; 8(12):4729-45. PMC: 3290985. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8124729. View