» Articles » PMID: 21776227

Maximum Cumulative Ratio (MCR) As a Tool for Assessing the Value of Performing a Cumulative Risk Assessment

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2011 Jul 22
PMID 21776227
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to the vast number of possible combinations of chemicals to which individuals are exposed and the resource-intensive nature of cumulative risk assessments, there is a need to determine when cumulative assessments are most required. This paper proposes the use of the maximum cumulative ratio (MCR) as a tool for this evaluation. MCR is the ratio of the cumulative toxicity received by an individual from exposure to multiple chemical stressors to the largest toxicity from a single chemical stressor. The MCR is a quantitative measure of the difference in an individual's toxicity estimated using a chemical-by-chemical approach and using an additive model of toxicity. As such, it provides a conservative estimate of the degree to which individuals' toxicities could be underestimated by not performing a cumulative risk assessment. In an example application, MCR is shown to be applicable to the evaluation of cumulative exposures involving up to 81 compounds and to provide key insights into the cumulative effects posed by exposures to multiple chemicals. In this example, MCR values suggest that individuals exposed to combinations of chemicals with the largest Hazard Indices were dominated by the contributions of one or two compounds.

Citing Articles

Combined Exposures and Mixtures Research: An Enduring NIEHS Priority.

Carlin D, Rider C Environ Health Perspect. 2024; 132(7):75001.

PMID: 38968090 PMC: 11225971. DOI: 10.1289/EHP14340.


Pesticide use negatively affects bumble bees across European landscapes.

Nicholson C, Knapp J, Kiljanek T, Albrecht M, Chauzat M, Costa C Nature. 2023; 628(8007):355-358.

PMID: 38030722 PMC: 11006599. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06773-3.


Priorities and Challenges in Methodology for Human Health Risk Assessment from Combined Exposure to Multiple Chemicals.

Nikolopoulou D, Ntzani E, Kyriakopoulou K, Anagnostopoulos C, Machera K Toxics. 2023; 11(5).

PMID: 37235216 PMC: 10224389. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11050401.


Ecological traits interact with landscape context to determine bees' pesticide risk.

Knapp J, Nicholson C, Jonsson O, de Miranda J, Rundlof M Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 7(4):547-556.

PMID: 36849537 PMC: 10089916. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-01990-5.


Evaluation of Complex Mixture Toxicity in the Milwaukee Estuary (WI, USA) Using Whole-Mixture and Component-Based Evaluation Methods.

Maloney E, Villeneuve D, Jensen K, Blackwell B, Kahl M, Poole S Environ Toxicol Chem. 2023; 42(6):1229-1256.

PMID: 36715369 PMC: 10775314. DOI: 10.1002/etc.5571.


References
1.
Junghans M, Backhaus T, Faust M, Scholze M, Grimme L . Application and validation of approaches for the predictive hazard assessment of realistic pesticide mixtures. Aquat Toxicol. 2005; 76(2):93-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.10.001. View

2.
Helsel D . Much ado about next to nothing: incorporating nondetects in science. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009; 54(3):257-62. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mep092. View

3.
Meek M, Boobis A, Crofton K, Heinemeyer G, Raaij M, Vickers C . Risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals: A WHO/IPCS framework. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011; . DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.03.010. View

4.
KONEMANN H . Fish toxicity tests with mixtures of more than two chemicals: a proposal for a quantitative approach and experimental results. Toxicology. 1981; 19(3):229-38. DOI: 10.1016/0300-483x(81)90132-3. View