» Articles » PMID: 32671684

Efficacy of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium As a First-Line Maintenance Treatment in Patients with COPD Who Are Naïve to LAMA, LABA and ICS: Pooled Analysis of Four Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal Adv Ther
Date 2020 Jul 17
PMID 32671684
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy of tiotropium/olodaterol compared with tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been demonstrated in a large clinical programme. Currently, randomised controlled trial (RCT) data on dual bronchodilation as first-line maintenance therapy are limited. In this post hoc analysis of pooled data from four RCTs, we compared the efficacy of tiotropium/olodaterol versus tiotropium as maintenance therapy in patients with COPD who were not receiving maintenance treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) ("maintenance naïve") at study entry.

Methods: TONADO 1/2 (52 weeks) and OTEMTO 1/2 (12 weeks) were phase III RCTs in patients with COPD. TONADO 1/2 and OTEMTO 1/2 enrolled patients with post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV) < 80% predicted (lower limit FEV ≥ 30% in OTEMTO 1/2 only). We examined the effect of tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 µg versus tiotropium 5 µg on trough FEV response, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and Transition Dyspnoea Index (TDI) focal score at 12 weeks in four pooled studies.

Results: The pooled analysis included 1078 maintenance-naïve patients. There were significant improvements with tiotropium/olodaterol versus tiotropium in trough FEV [0.056 L; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.033, 0.079; P < 0.0001], SGRQ score (- 1.780; 95% CI - 3.126 to - 0.434; P = 0.0096) and TDI score (0.409; 95% CI 0.077, 0.741; P = 0.0158) at week 12. For patients receiving tiotropium/olodaterol, the odds of achieving a minimal clinically important difference from baseline in any of the analysed outcomes (FEV ≥ 0.1 L, SGRQ ≥ 4.0 points or TDI ≥ 1.0 point) were higher versus tiotropium.

Conclusions: In patients who were maintenance naïve at baseline, treatment initiation with tiotropium/olodaterol resulted in greater improvements in lung function, health status and dyspnoea severity compared with tiotropium alone, without compromising patient safety. These results support the use of dual bronchodilation with tiotropium/olodaterol as first-line maintenance treatment in patients with COPD.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: TONADO 1 and 2 (NCT01431274 and NCT01431287, registered 8 September 2011) and OTEMTO 1 and 2 (NCT01964352 and NCT02006732, registered 14 October 2013).

Citing Articles

Long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting β-agonist combination for the treatment of maintenance therapy-naïve patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a narrative review.

Buhl R, Miravitlles M, Anzueto A, Brunton S Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2024; 18:17534666241279115.

PMID: 39352722 PMC: 11456191. DOI: 10.1177/17534666241279115.


Effect of different doses of Budesonide combined with Tiotropium bromide inhalation on elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Yu J, Ni J, Chen X, Fang Y, Fu S Pak J Med Sci. 2024; 40(7):1338-1344.

PMID: 39092049 PMC: 11255806. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.40.7.9209.


LABA/LAMA as First-Line Therapy for COPD: A Summary of the Evidence and Guideline Recommendations.

Miravitlles M, Kawayama T, Dreher M J Clin Med. 2022; 11(22).

PMID: 36431099 PMC: 9692772. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226623.


Characteristics of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treated with Long-Acting Bronchodilators in a Real-World Setting in Singapore: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Sim M, Yii A, Xu X, Bahety P, Loh C, Navarro Rojas A Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022; 17:1349-1363.

PMID: 35711173 PMC: 9192350. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S357820.


Health and functional status of tiotropium/olodaterol-treated patients with COPD: results from the AERIAL® non-interventional study.

Gillissen A, Marseille A, Skowasch D, Ritz J, Mattiucci-Guehlke M, Pabst S ERJ Open Res. 2021; 7(3).

PMID: 34513983 PMC: 8419313. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00004-2021.