» Articles » PMID: 32667038

Stakeholder Perspectives and Sustainability of an Integrated Care Model for the Prevention and Management of Obesity: the Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration (CORD) Project

Overview
Date 2020 Jul 16
PMID 32667038
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although reliable strategies exist to promote healthy habits that reduce childhood obesity, the sustainability of these strategies remains an ongoing public health challenge. This study aimed to identify factors experienced in a large, multisite project aimed at reducing childhood obesity that might contribute to project sustainability. Hypothesized constructs underpinning sustainability included replicability, continuation of benefits, institutionalization, and community capacity. Key informants (n = 27) completed 60 min, in-depth interviews, which were audio recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were first coded using a combined deductive and inductive approach. Four major themes emerged (with numerous subthemes): developing partnerships, challenges to the sustainability of implemented programming, the importance of intervening in multiple settings, and ongoing implementation and evaluation strategies. Replicability of complex childhood obesity interventions is possible when there are strong partnerships. Benefits can continue to be conferred from programming, particularly when evidence-based strategies are used that employ best practices. Implementation is facilitated by institutionalization and policies that buffer challenges, such as staffing or leadership changes. Community capacity both enhances the sustainability of interventions and develops as a result of strengthening partnerships and policies that support childhood obesity programming.

Citing Articles

Sustainability via Active Garden Education: The Sustainability Action Plan Model and Process.

Lee R, Szeszulski J, Lorenzo E, Arriola A, Bruening M, Estabrooks P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(9).

PMID: 35564909 PMC: 9102810. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095511.


A qualitative investigation of the need for and feasibility of weight loss programs on university campuses.

Bennett M, Whiteley J, Gu J, Gaminian A, Napolitano M Obes Res Clin Pract. 2022; 16(1):72-81.

PMID: 34996721 PMC: 8934592. DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2021.11.003.

References
1.
Miller D, Paradis E . Making it real: the institutionalization of collaboration through formal structure. J Interprof Care. 2020; 34(4):528-536. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1714563. View

2.
Ayala G, Ibarra L, Binggeli-Vallarta A, Moody J, McKenzie T, Angulo J . Our Choice/Nuestra Opción: the Imperial County, California, Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration study (CA-CORD). Child Obes. 2015; 11(1):37-47. PMC: 4323021. DOI: 10.1089/chi.2014.0080. View

3.
Huang T, Drewnosksi A, Kumanyika S, Glass T . A systems-oriented multilevel framework for addressing obesity in the 21st century. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009; 6(3):A82. PMC: 2722412. View

4.
Schwartz R, Smith C, Speers M, Dusenbury L, Bright F, Hedlund S . Capacity building and resource needs of state health agencies to implement community-based cardiovascular disease programs. J Public Health Policy. 1993; 14(4):480-94. View

5.
Wang Y, Cai L, Wu Y, Wilson R, Weston C, Fawole O . What childhood obesity prevention programmes work? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015; 16(7):547-65. PMC: 4561621. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12277. View