» Articles » PMID: 23375082

Public Health Program Capacity for Sustainability: a New Framework

Overview
Journal Implement Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2013 Feb 5
PMID 23375082
Citations 230
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Public health programs can only deliver benefits if they are able to sustain activities over time. There is a broad literature on program sustainability in public health, but it is fragmented and there is a lack of consensus on core constructs. The purpose of this paper is to present a new conceptual framework for program sustainability in public health.

Methods: This developmental study uses a comprehensive literature review, input from an expert panel, and the results of concept-mapping to identify the core domains of a conceptual framework for public health program capacity for sustainability. The concept-mapping process included three types of participants (scientists, funders, and practitioners) from several public health areas (e.g., tobacco control, heart disease and stroke, physical activity and nutrition, and injury prevention).

Results: The literature review identified 85 relevant studies focusing on program sustainability in public health. Most of the papers described empirical studies of prevention-oriented programs aimed at the community level. The concept-mapping process identified nine core domains that affect a program's capacity for sustainability: Political Support, Funding Stability, Partnerships, Organizational Capacity, Program Evaluation, Program Adaptation, Communications, Public Health Impacts, and Strategic Planning. Concept-mapping participants further identified 93 items across these domains that have strong face validity-89% of the individual items composing the framework had specific support in the sustainability literature.

Conclusions: The sustainability framework presented here suggests that a number of selected factors may be related to a program's ability to sustain its activities and benefits over time. These factors have been discussed in the literature, but this framework synthesizes and combines the factors and suggests how they may be interrelated with one another. The framework presents domains for public health decision makers to consider when developing and implementing prevention and intervention programs. The sustainability framework will be useful for public health decision makers, program managers, program evaluators, and dissemination and implementation researchers.

Citing Articles

An Analysis of National Institutes of Health-Funded Dissemination and Implementation Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Chtourou A, Garton E, Neta G Glob Implement Res Appl. 2025; 5(1):82-92.

PMID: 39958677 PMC: 11821738. DOI: 10.1007/s43477-024-00138-2.


Are we ready? assessing effectiveness and implementation of cancer control strategies in primary care: a comprehensive review of systematic reviews.

Martinez-Gutierrez J, Soto M, Rioseco A, Bienzobas C, Fowler M, Ulloa G Fam Pract. 2025; 42(2).

PMID: 39918006 PMC: 11803426. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmae078.


A cross-sectional study assessing barriers and facilitators to the sustainability of physical activity and nutrition interventions in early childhood education and care settings.

Imad N, Hall A, Nathan N, Shoesmith A, Pearson N, Lum M Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025; 22(1):2.

PMID: 39754137 PMC: 11699775. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01699-z.


A global survey addressing sustainability of pollen monitoring.

Dwarakanath D, Milic A, Beggs P, Wraith D, Davies J World Allergy Organ J. 2024; 17(12):100997.

PMID: 39634514 PMC: 11612360. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100997.


Leveraging machine learning to enhance appointment adherence at a novel post-discharge care transition clinic.

Lee S, Eagleson R, Hearld L, Gibson M, Hearld K, Hall A JAMIA Open. 2024; 7(4):ooae086.

PMID: 39524609 PMC: 11549956. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae086.


References
1.
Steckler A, Goodman R, McLeroy K, Davis S, Koch G . Measuring the diffusion of innovative health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 1991; 6(3):214-24. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-6.3.214. View

2.
Proctor E, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B . Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008; 36(1):24-34. PMC: 3808121. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4. View

3.
Green A, Aarons G . A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping. Implement Sci. 2011; 6:104. PMC: 3178500. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-104. View

4.
Evashwick C, Ory M . Organizational characteristics of successful innovative health care programs sustained over time. Fam Community Health. 2003; 26(3):177-93. DOI: 10.1097/00003727-200307000-00003. View

5.
Bowman C, Sobo E, Asch S, Gifford A . Measuring persistence of implementation: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008; 3:21. PMC: 2390585. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-21. View