» Articles » PMID: 32662101

Real-world Performance of the Atrial Fibrillation Monitor in Patients with a Subcutaneous ICD

Overview
Date 2020 Jul 15
PMID 32662101
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The third-generation subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) (EMBLEM™ A219, Boston Scientific) contains a new diagnostic tool to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) in S-ICD patients, without the use of an intracardiac lead. This is the first study to evaluate the performance of the S-ICD AF monitor (AFM).

Methods: The AFM algorithm analyzes a subcutaneous signal for the presence of AF, similar to the signals collected by implantable and wearable diagnostic devices. The AFM algorithm combines heart rate (HR) scatter analysis with an HR histogram. The algorithm was tested against publicly available electrocardiogram databases (simulated performance). Real-world performance of the algorithm was evaluated by using the S-ICD LATITUDE remote monitoring (RM) database.

Results: The simulated performance of the AFM algorithm resulted in a sensitivity of 95.0%, specificity of 100.0%, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100.0%. To evaluate the real-world performance of the AFM, 7744 S-ICD devices were followed for up to 30 months by RM, whereof 99.5% had the AFM enabled. A total of 387 AF episodes were randomly chosen for adjudication, resulting in a PPV of 67.7%. The main cause of misclassification was atrial and ventricular ectopy.

Conclusion: The AFM exhibited a very high sensitivity and specificity in a simulated setting, designed to maximize PPV in order to minimize the clinical burden of reviewing falsely detected AF events. The real-world performance of the AFM, enabled in 99.5% of S-ICD patients, is a PPV of 67.7%.

Citing Articles

New atrial arrhythmia occurrence in single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: A real-world investigation.

Patel D, Rao A, Friedman P, Deshmukh A, Lande J, Murphy J J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022; 34(2):438-444.

PMID: 36579406 PMC: 10108104. DOI: 10.1111/jce.15790.


Real-world performance of the atrial fibrillation monitor in patients with a subcutaneous ICD.

Baalman S, Mittal S, Boersma L, Perschbacher D, Brisben A, Mahajan D Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020; 43(12):1467-1475.

PMID: 32662101 PMC: 7754353. DOI: 10.1111/pace.14010.

References
1.
Kirchhof P, Blank B, Calvert M, Camm A, Chlouverakis G, Diener H . Probing oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial high rate episodes: Rationale and design of the Non-vitamin K antagonist Oral anticoagulants in patients with Atrial High rate episodes (NOAH-AFNET 6) trial. Am Heart J. 2017; 190:12-18. PMC: 5546174. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.04.015. View

2.
Van Gelder I, Healey J, Crijns H, Wang J, Hohnloser S, Gold M . Duration of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and occurrence of stroke in ASSERT. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(17):1339-1344. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx042. View

3.
Sarkar S, Ritscher D, Mehra R . A detector for a chronic implantable atrial tachyarrhythmia monitor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008; 55(3):1219-24. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.903707. View

4.
Deshmukh A, Brown M, Higgins E, Schousek B, Abeyratne A, Rovaris G . Performance of Atrial Fibrillation Detection in a New Single-Chamber ICD. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016; 39(10):1031-1037. DOI: 10.1111/pace.12918. View

5.
Petrutiu S, Sahakian A, Swiryn S . Abrupt changes in fibrillatory wave characteristics at the termination of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in humans. Europace. 2007; 9(7):466-70. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eum096. View