» Articles » PMID: 32660314

Interventions to Reduce Aerosolized Microbes in Dental Practice: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal J Dent Res
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Jul 15
PMID 32660314
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to identify and rank the effectiveness of different interventions used in dental practice to reduce microbial load in aerosolized compounds. Seven electronic databases were searched to April 6, 2020, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or nonrandomized prospective studies in the field. Study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were performed for all included studies, while the outcome of interest pertained to differences in bacterial load quantification through the use of different interventions prior to aerosol-generating procedures in dental practices. Random effects frequentist network meta-analysis was performed, with mean difference (MD) and 95% CI as the effect measure. Confidence in the documented evidence was assessed through the newly fueled CINeMA framework (Confidence in Network Meta-analysis) based on the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Twenty-nine clinical trials were deemed eligible, 21 RCTs and 8 nonrandomized studies, while 11 RCTs contributed to the network meta-analysis, comprising 10 competing interventions. Tempered chlorhexidine (CHX) 0.2% as compared with nonactive control mouth rinse, prior to routine ultrasonic scaling, was most effective toward reduced postprocedural bacterial load with an MD of -0.92 (95% CI, -1.54 to -0.29) in log bacterial CFUs (colony-forming units). For CHX 0.2%, an MD of -0.74 (95% CI, -1.07 to -0.40) was observed as compared with control. Tempered CHX 0.2% presented the highest probabilities of being ranked the most effective treatment (31.2%). Level of confidence varied from very low to moderate across all formulated comparisons. These findings summarize the current state of research evidence in the field of aerosolized bacteria in dentistry. Instigated by the era of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the stipulation of a broader evaluation of the aerosolized microbes, including viruses, potentially coupled with disinfectant-based prevention schemes should be prioritized.

Citing Articles

Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine on Covid-19 Viral Load - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mallick S, Bhuvaneshwari S, Sangamesh N, Mishra S, Bajoria A, Singh D J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025; 16(Suppl 5):S4306-S4309.

PMID: 40061702 PMC: 11888758. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_665_24.


Bioaerosols and Airborne Transmission in the Dental Clinic.

Allison J, Tiede S, Holliday R, Durham J, Jakubovics N Int Dent J. 2024; 74 Suppl 2:S418-S428.

PMID: 39515929 PMC: 11583874. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.09.026.


Nebulised/aerosolised drugs in anaesthesiology, critical care and pain practice-benefit with a professional hazard!.

Garg R Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 68(4):315-316.

PMID: 38586262 PMC: 10993933. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_206_24.


Cetylpyridinium chloride and chlorhexidine show antiviral activity against Influenza A virus and Respiratory Syncytial virus in vitro.

Rius-Salvador M, Garcia-Murria M, Rusu L, Bano-Polo M, Leon R, Geller R PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0297291.

PMID: 38363760 PMC: 10871507. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297291.


The Impact of Hydrogen Peroxide (HO) Fumigation on Bacterial Levels in Dental Office Environments: A Randomized Clinical Trial Investigation.

Matys J, Gedrange T, Dominiak M, Grzech-Lesniak K J Clin Med. 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38137619 PMC: 10743773. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247551.