» Articles » PMID: 32642107

Prognostic Impact of Lymphadenectomy on Outcomes of Sublobar Resection for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer ≤1 or >1 to 2 Cm

Overview
Journal J Thorac Dis
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2020 Jul 10
PMID 32642107
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lymphadenectomy is an important part of surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognostic impact of lymph node (LN) dissection for patients with NSCLC ≤1 and >1 to 2 cm who underwent sublobar resection is still unclear.

Methods: A group of patients numbering 7,627 with NSCLC 2 cm or less who underwent sublobar resection were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between January 2010 and November 2015. The overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were evaluated among patients who had undergone dissection of ≥4 LNs, 1 to 3 LNs or who had no-LN dissection; log-rank and Cox proportional-hazards regression analyses were used for the evaluation.

Results: Patients with NSCLC ≤2 cm who underwent ≥4 LNs dissection had better OS and LCSS compared with those who underwent dissection of 1 to 3 LNs or who had no-LN dissection after sublobar resection. Subgroup analysis showed that dissection of ≥4 LNs had better OS and LCSS than those of 1 to 3 LNs dissection in NSCLC >1 to 2 cm, whereas had similar OS and LCSS in NSCLC ≤1 cm. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that dissection of 1 to 3 LNs was not an independent risk factor of OS and LCSS than dissection of ≥4 LNs in NSCLC ≤1 cm after sublobar resection.

Conclusions: The extent of LN dissection is associated with the survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC ≤2 cm after sublobar resection. Dissection of ≥4 LNs should be recommended for NSCLC >1 to 2 cm, whereas surgeons can rely on surgical skills and patient profiles to decide ≥4 LNs or 1 to 3 LNs dissection for NSCLC ≤1 cm during sublobar resection.

Citing Articles

Impact of the number of dissected lymph nodes on machine learning-based prediction of postoperative lung cancer recurrence: a single-hospital retrospective cohort study.

Kojima K, Samejima H, Okishio K, Tokunaga T, Yoon H, Atagi S BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 39327061 PMC: 11429344. DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001926.


Outcomes of sublobar resection vs lobectomy for invasive clinical stage T1N0 non-small-cell lung cancer: A propensity-match analysis.

Wald O, Sadeh B, Bdolah-Abram T, Erez E, Shapira O, Izhar U Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021; 4(3):e1339.

PMID: 33570255 PMC: 8222555. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1339.

References
1.
Aberle D, Adams A, Berg C, Black W, Clapp J, Fagerstrom R . Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(5):395-409. PMC: 4356534. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. View

2.
Ding H, Wang H, Xu L, Song N, Jiang G . Survival and Resected Lymph Node Number During Sublobar Resection for N0 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 2 cm or Less. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 107(6):1647-1655. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.12.024. View

3.
Zhong C, Sakurai H, Wei S, Fang W, Asamura H . Sublobar resections for small-sized stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma: a Sino-Japanese multicenter study. J Thorac Dis. 2018; 10(2):991-998. PMC: 5864666. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.63. View

4.
Lee P, Korst R, Port J, Kerem Y, Kansler A, Altorki N . Long-term survival and recurrence in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer 1 cm or less in size. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 132(6):1382-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.08.053. View

5.
Darling G, Allen M, Decker P, Ballman K, Malthaner R, Inculet R . Randomized trial of mediastinal lymph node sampling versus complete lymphadenectomy during pulmonary resection in the patient with N0 or N1 (less than hilar) non-small cell carcinoma: results of the American College of Surgery Oncology Group Z0030.... J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 141(3):662-70. PMC: 5082844. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.11.008. View