» Articles » PMID: 32639956

Age-related Change in Flicker Thresholds with Rod- and Cone-enhanced Stimuli

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Jul 9
PMID 32639956
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Rod and cone photoreceptor-specific tests can be time-consuming. A new non-invasive test is described. The test is based on the measurement of flicker modulation thresholds with rod- and cone-enhanced visual stimuli, which requires only minimum adaptation time. Here, we investigated how the rod-and cone-mediated flicker thresholds vary with age.

Methods: Monocular thresholds with rod and cone-enhanced stimuli were measured in 140 healthy adults, (age range: 18-75 years), foveally (0°) and at four parafoveal locations, at an eccentricity of 5° in each of the four quadrants using five, adaptive, interleaved staircases. Temporal frequencies, stimulus sizes, background luminance and spectral composition, were adjusted appropriately to achieve approximately 1 log unit separation in sensitivity between the rod- and cone-enhanced stimuli. Spectrally calibrated, 'neutral density' filters were used to enable adequate control of display luminance for rod enhanced stimuli.

Results: The magnitude of central and parafoveal rod thresholds was significantly higher than the central and parafoveal cone thresholds, respectively (p < 0.001) in both the age groups. However, the rate of increase in central rod thresholds (y = 0.45x-12.79; linear regression equation) was not significantly steeper than the rate of increase in central (y = 0.29x-8.53) cone thresholds (p = 0.15). Centrally, cone thresholds showed a better correlation with rod central thresholds for the age > 45 years (Spearman correlation, ρ = 0.74, p < 0.001) compared to age ≤ 45 years (ρ = 0.41, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Thresholds with rod- and cone-enhanced stimuli are largely invariant below 45 years of age and increase rapidly above this age. This age-wise normative database can be used as an effective functional-marker to assess photoreceptor sensitivities in retinal diseases.

Citing Articles

Changes in Waveguiding Cone Photoreceptors and Color Vision in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

Vaughan M, Tay N, Kalitzeos A, Kane T, Singh N, Zheng A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(14):28.

PMID: 39671213 PMC: 11645757. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.14.28.


Effect of monocular sensitivity on binocular summation of luminance-modulated flicker.

Durai C, Hathibelagal A, Rodriguez-Carmona M, Barbur J, Bharadwaj S PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280785.

PMID: 36693078 PMC: 9873164. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280785.


Age-related decline in function of ON and OFF visual pathways.

Hathibelagal A, Prajapati V, Jayagopi I, Jalali S, Ballae Ganeshrao S PLoS One. 2022; 17(3):e0261489.

PMID: 35316274 PMC: 8939797. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261489.


Aging effects on contrast sensitivity in visual pathways: A pilot study on flicker adaptation.

Zhuang X, Tran T, Jin D, Philip R, Wu C PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0261927.

PMID: 34972163 PMC: 8719693. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261927.


Relationship Between Flicker Modulation Sensitivity and Retinal Ganglion Cell Related Layer Thicknesses.

Perez-Carrasco M, Carballo-Alvarez J, Barbur J, Puell M Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021; 10(12):16.

PMID: 34647964 PMC: 8525864. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.12.16.


References
1.
Legras R, Gaudric A, Woog K . Distribution of cone density, spacing and arrangement in adult healthy retinas with adaptive optics flood illumination. PLoS One. 2018; 13(1):e0191141. PMC: 5770065. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191141. View

2.
Garhofer G, Zawinka C, Resch H, Huemer K, Dorner G, Schmetterer L . Diffuse luminance flicker increases blood flow in major retinal arteries and veins. Vision Res. 2004; 44(8):833-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.013. View

3.
Jackson G, Scott I, Kim I, Quillen D, Iannaccone A, Edwards J . Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of dark adaptometry for detection of age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55(3):1427-31. PMC: 3954002. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-13745. View

4.
Winn B, Whitaker D, Elliott D, Phillips N . Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994; 35(3):1132-7. View

5.
Anderson A, Vingrys A . Multiple processes mediate flicker sensitivity. Vision Res. 2001; 41(19):2449-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00139-0. View