» Articles » PMID: 32632709

Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Social Cognition

Abstract

The traditional view on the cerebellum is that it controls motor behavior. Although recent work has revealed that the cerebellum supports also nonmotor functions such as cognition and affect, only during the last 5 years it has become evident that the cerebellum also plays an important social role. This role is evident in social cognition based on interpreting goal-directed actions through the movements of individuals (social "mirroring") which is very close to its original role in motor learning, as well as in social understanding of other individuals' mental state, such as their intentions, beliefs, past behaviors, future aspirations, and personality traits (social "mentalizing"). Most of this mentalizing role is supported by the posterior cerebellum (e.g., Crus I and II). The most dominant hypothesis is that the cerebellum assists in learning and understanding social action sequences, and so facilitates social cognition by supporting optimal predictions about imminent or future social interaction and cooperation. This consensus paper brings together experts from different fields to discuss recent efforts in understanding the role of the cerebellum in social cognition, and the understanding of social behaviors and mental states by others, its effect on clinical impairments such as cerebellar ataxia and autism spectrum disorder, and how the cerebellum can become a potential target for noninvasive brain stimulation as a therapeutic intervention. We report on the most recent empirical findings and techniques for understanding and manipulating cerebellar circuits in humans. Cerebellar circuitry appears now as a key structure to elucidate social interactions.

Citing Articles

Cognition in cerebellar disorders: What's in the profile? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reumers S, Bongaerts F, de Leeuw F, van de Warrenburg B, Schutter D, Kessels R J Neurol. 2025; 272(3):250.

PMID: 40047904 PMC: 11885410. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-025-12967-8.


A Gene-Expression Based Comparison of Murine and Human Inhibitory Interneurons in the Cerebellar Cortex and Nuclei.

Schilling K Cerebellum. 2025; 24(2):55.

PMID: 40019676 PMC: 11870911. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-025-01809-y.


Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation improves quality of life in individuals with chronic poststroke aphasia.

Zheng Z, Wang J, Lee S, Wang K, Zhang B, Howard M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6898.

PMID: 40011597 PMC: 11865529. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90927-y.


Neural correlates of communication modes in medical students using fMRI.

Oprea R, Andersson F, Gissot V, Desmidt T, Siragusa M, Barantin L Brain Imaging Behav. 2025; .

PMID: 39984809 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-025-00985-z.


The Cerebellar Role in Emotions at a Turning Point: Bibliometric Analysis and Collaboration Networks.

Osorio-Becerra D, DAngelo E, Casellato C Cerebellum. 2025; 24(2):47.

PMID: 39960593 PMC: 11832776. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-025-01800-7.


References
1.
Bower J . Is the cerebellum sensory for motor's sake, or motor for sensory's sake: the view from the whiskers of a rat?. Prog Brain Res. 1997; 114:463-96. DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)63381-6. View

2.
Hecht E, Murphy L, Gutman D, Votaw J, Schuster D, Preuss T . Differences in neural activation for object-directed grasping in chimpanzees and humans. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(35):14117-34. PMC: 3756757. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2172-13.2013. View

3.
Guell X, Hoche F, Schmahmann J . Metalinguistic deficits in patients with cerebellar dysfunction: empirical support for the dysmetria of thought theory. Cerebellum. 2014; 14(1):50-8. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-014-0630-z. View

4.
Courchesne E . Neuroanatomic imaging in autism. Pediatrics. 1991; 87(5 Pt 2):781-90. View

5.
Laird A, Fox P, Eickhoff S, Turner J, Ray K, McKay D . Behavioral interpretations of intrinsic connectivity networks. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011; 23(12):4022-37. PMC: 3690655. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00077. View