Mentalizing About Dynamic Social Action Sequences Is Supported by the Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia, and Neocortex: A Meta-Analysis of Activation and Connectivity

Overview

Journal Hum Brain Mapp

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Neurology

Date 2024 Dec 17

PMID 39688325

Authors

Frank Van Overwalle

Elien Heleven

Naem Haihambo

Meijia Li

Qianying Ma

Min Pu

Chris Baeken

Natacha Deroost

Kris Baetens

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The posterior cerebellum and anterior basal ganglia are critical subcortical structures for learning and identifying dynamic action sequences, in concert with the neocortex. The present analysis investigates the role of action sequences during social mentalizing, termed here dynamic or sequential social mentalizing. Although the role of the cerebellum in dynamic social mentalizing was extensively investigated during the last decade, the basal ganglia were long ignored. We conducted an activation likelihood estimation coordinate-based meta-analysis of sequential social mentalizing tasks (with 485 participants in 17 studies). These tasks required participants to make social mentalizing inferences ranging from low-level goals to high-level beliefs and traits, while either memorizing, generating or predicting temporal sequences of the social actions involved (i.e., social sequencing condition), or not (i.e., social non-sequencing control condition), or did so for nonsocial objects (i.e., nonsocial sequencing control condition). The tasks also occasionally included inconsistencies in social behavior. Results revealed that the cerebellum exhibited a preference for social, sequencing, and inconsistent information, while the basal ganglia showed a preference for sequencing and inconsistency, without a general preference for social input. Meta-analytic connectivity analysis further showed evidence of coactivation between mentalizing areas of the cerebellum, basal ganglia and cerebral neocortex. The present work underscores the role of subcortical structures in social mentalizing about dynamic action sequences.

References

Milardi D, Quartarone A, Bramanti A, Anastasi G, Bertino S, Basile G . The Cortico-Basal Ganglia-Cerebellar Network: Past, Present and Future Perspectives. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019; 13:61. PMC: 6831548. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00061. View

Van Overwalle F, Pu M, Ma Q, Li M, Haihambo N, Baetens K . The Involvement of the Posterior Cerebellum in Reconstructing and Predicting Social Action Sequences. Cerebellum. 2021; 21(5):733-741. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-021-01333-9. View

Andrews-Hanna J, Reidler J, Sepulcre J, Poulin R, Buckner R . Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain's default network. Neuron. 2010; 65(4):550-62. PMC: 2848443. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.005. View

Cattaneo L, Barchiesi G, Tabarelli D, Arfeller C, Sato M, Glenberg A . One's motor performance predictably modulates the understanding of others' actions through adaptation of premotor visuo-motor neurons. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010; 6(3):301-10. PMC: 3110437. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsq099. View

Kostadinov D, Hausser M . Reward signals in the cerebellum: Origins, targets, and functional implications. Neuron. 2022; 110(8):1290-1303. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.02.015. View

Diedrichsen J, Zotow E . Surface-Based Display of Volume-Averaged Cerebellar Imaging Data. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0133402. PMC: 4521932. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133402. View

Van Overwalle F, Ma Q, Heleven E . The posterior crus II cerebellum is specialized for social mentalizing and emotional self-experiences: a meta-analysis. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020; 15(9):905-928. PMC: 7851889. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa124. View

Langdon R, Coltheart M . Mentalising, schizotypy, and schizophrenia. Cognition. 1999; 71(1):43-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00018-9. View

Haber S, Knutson B . The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009; 35(1):4-26. PMC: 3055449. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2009.129. View

10.

Prat C, Stocco A, Neuhaus E, Kleinhans N . Basal ganglia impairments in autism spectrum disorder are related to abnormal signal gating to prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia. 2016; 91:268-281. PMC: 6453580. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.007. View

11.

Wolpert D, Miall R, Kawato M . Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011; 2(9):338-47. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2. View

12.

Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley J . Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 36(1):341-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.004. View

13.

Janacsek K, Shattuck K, Tagarelli K, Lum J, Turkeltaub P, Ullman M . Sequence learning in the human brain: A functional neuroanatomical meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies. Neuroimage. 2019; 207:116387. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116387. View

14.

Wagner M, Kim T, Savall J, Schnitzer M, Luo L . Cerebellar granule cells encode the expectation of reward. Nature. 2017; 544(7648):96-100. PMC: 5532014. DOI: 10.1038/nature21726. View

15.

Pu M, Ma Q, Haihambo N, Li M, Baeken C, Baetens K . Dynamic causal modeling of cerebello-cerebral connectivity when sequencing trait-implying actions. Cereb Cortex. 2022; 33(10):6366-6381. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac510. View

16.

Li M, Ma Q, Baetens K, Pu M, Deroost N, Baeken C . Social cerebellum in goal-directed navigation. Soc Neurosci. 2021; 16(5):467-485. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2021.1970017. View

17.

Van Overwalle F, De Coninck S, Heleven E, Perrotta G, Taib N, Manto M . The role of the cerebellum in reconstructing social action sequences: a pilot study. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019; 14(5):549-558. PMC: 6545532. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsz032. View

18.

Granziera C, Schmahmann J, Hadjikhani N, Meyer H, Meuli R, Wedeen V . Diffusion spectrum imaging shows the structural basis of functional cerebellar circuits in the human cerebellum in vivo. PLoS One. 2009; 4(4):e5101. PMC: 2659746. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005101. View

19.

Leggio M, Chiricozzi F, Clausi S, Tedesco A, Molinari M . The neuropsychological profile of cerebellar damage: The sequencing hypothesis. Cortex. 2009; 47(1):137-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.011. View

20.

Eisinger R, Urdaneta M, Foote K, Okun M, Gunduz A . Non-motor Characterization of the Basal Ganglia: Evidence From Human and Non-human Primate Electrophysiology. Front Neurosci. 2018; 12:385. PMC: 6041403. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00385. View