» Articles » PMID: 32630782

Direct Ink Writing Technology (3D Printing) of Graphene-Based Ceramic Nanocomposites: A Review

Overview
Date 2020 Jul 8
PMID 32630782
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the present work, the state of the art of the most common additive manufacturing (AM) technologies used for the manufacturing of complex shape structures of graphene-based ceramic nanocomposites, ceramic and graphene-based parts is explained. A brief overview of the AM processes for ceramic, which are grouped by the type of feedstock used in each technology, is presented. The main technical factors that affect the quality of the final product were reviewed. The AM processes used for 3D printing of graphene-based materials are described in more detail; moreover, some studies in a wide range of applications related to these AM techniques are cited. Furthermore, different feedstock formulations and their corresponding rheological behavior were explained. Additionally, the most important works about the fabrication of composites using graphene-based ceramic pastes by Direct Ink Writing (DIW) are disclosed in detail and illustrated with representative examples. Various examples of the most relevant approaches for the manufacturing of graphene-based ceramic nanocomposites by DIW are provided.

Citing Articles

Participation of Polymer Materials in the Structure of Piezoelectric Composites.

Pirvu C, Sover A, Abrudeanu M Polymers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39771453 PMC: 11678843. DOI: 10.3390/polym16243603.


Additive Fabrication of Polyaniline and Carbon-Based Composites for Energy Storage.

Hemha N, Khajonrit J, Nuansing W Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39684115 PMC: 11644309. DOI: 10.3390/polym16233369.


Machine learning enables electrical resistivity modeling of printed lines in aerosol jet 3D printing.

Li M, Yin S, Liu Z, Zhang H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):14614.

PMID: 38918598 PMC: 11199662. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65693-y.


MOF-Enhanced Aluminosilicate Ceramic Membranes Using Non-Firing Processes for Pesticide Filtration and Phytochrome Removal.

Zhao L, Xu J, Li M, Ji Y, Sun Y, Zhang Z Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38869569 PMC: 11173857. DOI: 10.3390/nano14110944.


Hot Fingers: Individually Addressable Graphene-Heater Actuated Liquid Crystal Grippers.

van Hazendonk L, Khalil Z, van Grondelle W, Wijkhuijs L, Schreur-Piet I, Debije M ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024; 16(25):32739-32747.

PMID: 38869014 PMC: 11212024. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.4c06130.


References
1.
Manapat J, Mangadlao J, Tiu B, Tritchler G, Advincula R . High-Strength Stereolithographic 3D Printed Nanocomposites: Graphene Oxide Metastability. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017; 9(11):10085-10093. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b16174. View

2.
Truby R, Lewis J . Printing soft matter in three dimensions. Nature. 2016; 540(7633):371-378. DOI: 10.1038/nature21003. View

3.
Smirnov A, Peretyagin P, Pinargote N, Gershman I, Bartolome J . Wear Behavior of Graphene-Reinforced Alumina⁻Silicon Carbide Whisker Nanocomposite. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019; 9(2). PMC: 6409536. DOI: 10.3390/nano9020151. View

4.
Gong L, Young R, Kinloch I, Riaz I, Jalil R, Novoselov K . Optimizing the reinforcement of polymer-based nanocomposites by graphene. ACS Nano. 2012; 6(3):2086-95. DOI: 10.1021/nn203917d. View

5.
Chen Q, Mangadlao J, Wallat J, de Leon A, Pokorski J, Advincula R . 3D Printing Biocompatible Polyurethane/Poly(lactic acid)/Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites: Anisotropic Properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016; 9(4):4015-4023. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b11793. View