» Articles » PMID: 32615720

Low Predictive Value of FRAX Adjusted by Trabecular Bone Score for Osteoporotic Fractures in Korean Women: A Community-Based Cohort Study

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2020 Jul 4
PMID 32615720
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The value of the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and the trabecular bone score (TBS) for assessing osteoporotic fracture risk has not been fully elucidated in Koreans. We conducted this study to clarify the predictive value of FRAX adjusted by TBS for osteoporotic fractures in Korean women.

Methods: After screening 7,192 eligible subjects from the Ansung cohort, 1,165 women aged 45 to 76 years with available bone mineral density (BMD) and TBS data were enrolled in this study. We assessed their clinical risk factors for osteoporotic fractures and evaluated the predictive value of FRAX with or without BMD and TBS.

Results: During the mean follow-up period of 7.5 years, 99 (8.5%) women suffered major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) and 28 (2.4%) experienced hip fractures. FRAX without BMD, BMD-adjusted FRAX, and TBS-adjusted FRAX were significantly associated with the risk of MOFs (hazard ratio [HR] per percent increase, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.14; HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.15; and HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.13, respectively). However, BMD-adjusted FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX did not predict MOFs better than FRAX without BMD based on the Harrell's C statistic. FRAX probabilities showed limited value for predicting hip fractures. The cut-off values of FRAX without BMD, FRAX with BMD, and FRAX with BMD adjusted by TBS for predicting MOFs were 7.2%, 5.0%, and 6.7%, respectively.

Conclusion: FRAX with BMD and TBS adjustment did not show better predictive value for osteoporotic fractures in this study than FRAX without adjustment. Moreover, the cut-off values of FRAX probabilities for treatment might be lower in Korean women than in other countries.

Citing Articles

Imaging bone turnover assessment through volumetric density-adjusted standardized uptake value using quantitative bone SPECT/CT in osteoporosis.

Lee D, Oh J, Kim J, Lee S, Kim B, Koh J EJNMMI Res. 2024; 14(1):75.

PMID: 39182210 PMC: 11345349. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-024-01137-y.


Enhancing Osteoporosis Management: A Thorough Examination of Surgical Techniques and Their Effects on Patient Outcomes.

Popa M, Cursaru A, Cretu B, Iordache S, Iacobescu G, Spiridonica R Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e59681.

PMID: 38836146 PMC: 11149898. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59681.


Update on the clinical use of trabecular bone score (TBS) in the management of osteoporosis: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal....

Shevroja E, Reginster J, Lamy O, Al-Daghri N, Chandran M, Demoux-Baiada A Osteoporos Int. 2023; 34(9):1501-1529.

PMID: 37393412 PMC: 10427549. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06817-4.


Chronic airway disease as a major risk factor for fractures in osteopenic women: Nationwide cohort study.

Kong S, Jo A, Park C, Park K, Yun J, Kim J Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1085252.

PMID: 37025406 PMC: 10070847. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1085252.


Screening for the primary prevention of fragility fractures among adults aged 40 years and older in primary care: systematic reviews of the effects and acceptability of screening and treatment, and the accuracy of risk prediction tools.

Gates M, Pillay J, Nuspl M, Wingert A, Vandermeer B, Hartling L Syst Rev. 2023; 12(1):51.

PMID: 36945065 PMC: 10029308. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02181-w.


References
1.
Kanis J, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Ogelsby A . International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res. 2002; 17(7):1237-44. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.7.1237. View

2.
Roux J, Wegrzyn J, Boutroy S, Bouxsein M, Hans D, Chapurlat R . The predictive value of trabecular bone score (TBS) on whole lumbar vertebrae mechanics: an ex vivo study. Osteoporos Int. 2013; 24(9):2455-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2316-7. View

3.
Center J, Nguyen T, Schneider D, Sambrook P, Eisman J . Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet. 1999; 353(9156):878-82. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09075-8. View

4.
Kanis J . Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1994; 4(6):368-81. DOI: 10.1007/BF01622200. View

5.
Cheung E, Bow C, Cheung C, Soong C, Yeung S, Loong C . Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2011; 23(3):871-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1647-5. View