» Articles » PMID: 21279504

Fracture Risk Prediction Using FRAX®: a 10-year Follow-up Survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2011 Feb 1
PMID 21279504
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: We evaluated the predictive ability of FRAX® in a cohort of 815 Japanese women. The observed 10-year fracture rate did not differ significantly from that predicted by FRAX®. The predictive ability of FRAX® without femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was similar to that with femoral neck BMD.

Introduction: We evaluated the ability of the Japanese version of FRAX®, a World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool, to predict the 10-year probability of osteoporotic fracture.

Methods: Self-reported major osteoporotic fracture (N = 43) and hip fracture (N = 4) events were ascertained in the 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis Cohort Study. Participants were 815 women aged 40-74 years at the baseline survey. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis compared FRAX® with multiple logistic models based on age, body weight, and femoral neck BMD.

Results: The number of observed major osteoporotic or hip fracture events did not differ significantly from the number of events predicted by the FRAX® model (with or without BMD). The area under the curve (AUC) value for FRAX® with BMD for predicting major osteoporotic fractures was similar to that of a logistic model with age, body weight, and BMD (0.69 vs. 0.71, respectively; p = 0.198); the AUC of FRAX® with BMD for predicting hip fractures was similar to that of a model based on age and BMD (0.88 vs. 0.89, respectively; p = 0.164). The AUCs of FRAX® without BMD for predicting major osteoporotic and hip fractures were similar to those with BMD (0.69 vs. 0.67, respectively; p = 0.121; 0.88 vs. 0.86, respectively; p = 0.445).

Conclusions: The Japanese version of FRAX® without BMD estimated the 10-year probability of osteoporotic fracture in this population with few clinical risk factors as similar to that of FRAX® with BMD.

Citing Articles

Discriminatory Accuracy of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jha D, Chandran M, Hong N, Rhee Y, Baek S, Ferguson S J Bone Metab. 2024; 31(4):296-315.

PMID: 39701109 PMC: 11658842. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.24.781.


The development and validation of a prediction model for imminent vertebral osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal women.

Lin S, Luo Y, Xie Y, Liao Y, Niu S, Zheng Y Eur Spine J. 2024; .

PMID: 38844587 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08333-3.


Age-dependent FRAX-based assessment and intervention thresholds for therapeutic decision making in osteoporosis in the Malaysian population.

Ratnasingam J, Niyaz M, Mariyappan S, Ong T, Chan S, Hew F Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):18.

PMID: 38503995 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01371-w.


An enhanced version of FREM (Fracture Risk Evaluation Model) using national administrative health data: analysis protocol for development and validation of a multivariable prediction model.

Kristensen S, Clausen A, Skjodt M, Sondergaard J, Abrahamsen B, Moller S Diagn Progn Res. 2023; 7(1):19.

PMID: 37784165 PMC: 10546772. DOI: 10.1186/s41512-023-00158-w.


Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021.

Corrao G, Biffi A, Porcu G, Ronco R, Adami G, Alvaro R Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1137671.

PMID: 37143730 PMC: 10151776. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137671.


References
1.
Obuchowski N, Zhou X . Prospective studies of diagnostic test accuracy when disease prevalence is low. Biostatistics. 2003; 3(4):477-92. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/3.4.477. View

2.
Rea J, Chen M, Li J, Blake G, Steiger P, Genant H . Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: a comparison of prevalent vertebral deformity identification. J Bone Miner Res. 2000; 15(3):564-74. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.3.564. View

3.
Siggeirsdottir K, Aspelund T, Sigurdsson G, Mogensen B, Chang M, Jonsdottir B . Inaccuracy in self-report of fractures may underestimate association with health outcomes when compared with medical record based fracture registry. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007; 22(9):631-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-007-9163-9. View

4.
Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis J . World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 1997; 7(5):407-13. DOI: 10.1007/pl00004148. View

5.
Ismail A, ONeill T, Cockerill W, Finn J, Cannata J, Hoszowski K . Validity of self-report of fractures: results from a prospective study in men and women across Europe. EPOS Study Group. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11(3):248-54. DOI: 10.1007/s001980050288. View