» Articles » PMID: 32612669

Nutrient Solutions for : a Study on Nutrient Solution Composition in Hydroponics Systems

Overview
Journal Plant Methods
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Jul 3
PMID 32612669
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is little information on the effect of nutrient solutions composition on Arabidopsis growth. Therefore, we compared growth performance of (Col-0) grown on the most commonly used nutrient solutions in deep water culture: Hoagland and Arnon, Murashige and Skoog, Tocquin, Hermans, and Conn. In addition to these nutrient solution composition experiments, we established Arabidopsis growth response curves for nutrient solution concentration and salt stress (NaCl).

Results: Arabidopsis rosette fresh and dry weight showed an approximate linear decline with NaCl dose in deep water culture, i.e. 9% reduction relative to control per unit of electrical conductivity (EC in dS m, for scale comprehension 1 dS m equals ~ 10 mM NaCl). The Tocquin, ½Hoagland and Conn nutrient solutions had equal and optimal growth performance. Optimal nutrient solution concentration for Tocquin and Hoagland was 0.8 to 0.9 dS m. Close to the EC of ½Hoagland (1.1 dS m), which is frequently used in Arabidopsis research. Conn solution showed optimal growth at much higher EC (2 dS m) indicating that it is a balanced nutrient solution that matches the needs of Arabidopsis. Full Murashige and Skoog solution (5.9 dS m) was lethal and diluted solutions (EC of 1.6 and 1.1 dS m) caused stress symptoms and severe growth retardation at later developmental stages.

Conclusions: (Col-0) plants grown in deep water culture showed a sixfold growth difference when commonly used nutrient solutions were compared. Murashige and Skoog solution should not be used as nutrient solution in deep water culture. Conn, Tocquin and ½Hoagland are balanced nutrient solutions which result in optimal Arabidopsis growth in hydroponic systems.

Citing Articles

Allelopathic and auto-toxic effects of aqueous extracts of Codonopsis pilosula root secretions.

Qiu D, Wang X, Xu F, Li Q, Ren F, Jiang K PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0315657.

PMID: 39888897 PMC: 11785337. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315657.


Effect of S-Allyl-L-Cysteine on Nitric Oxide and Cadmium Processes in Rice ( L. sp. Zhongzao35) Seedlings.

Huo X, Wang C, Huang Y, Kong W, Wang X Toxics. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39590985 PMC: 11598062. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12110805.


Combating wheat yellow mosaic virus through microbial interactions and hormone pathway modulations.

Wang F, Zhang H, Liu H, Wu C, Wan Y, Zhu L Microbiome. 2024; 12(1):200.

PMID: 39407339 PMC: 11481568. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-01911-z.


Mass spectrometry imaging of with DO labeling.

Na S, Lee Y Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1379299.

PMID: 38882571 PMC: 11176549. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1379299.


Transcription Factor HB7 Improves Ice Plant Drought Tolerance through ABA Signaling Pathway.

Zhang X, Cheng Z, Fan G, Zhu D, Tan B, Jiang T Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(8).

PMID: 38674154 PMC: 11050535. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25084569.


References
1.
Raven J . Chloride: essential micronutrient and multifunctional beneficial ion. J Exp Bot. 2017; 38(3):359-367. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw421. View

2.
Karssemeijer P, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J, van Loon J, Dicke M . Foliar herbivory by caterpillars and aphids differentially affects phytohormonal signalling in roots and plant defence to a root herbivore. Plant Cell Environ. 2019; 43(3):775-786. PMC: 7065167. DOI: 10.1111/pce.13707. View

3.
Alatorre-Cobos F, Calderon-Vazquez C, Ibarra-Laclette E, Yong-Villalobos L, Perez-Torres C, Oropeza-Aburto A . An improved, low-cost, hydroponic system for growing Arabidopsis and other plant species under aseptic conditions. BMC Plant Biol. 2014; 14:69. PMC: 3999955. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-69. View

4.
Smeets K, Ruytinx J, Van Belleghem F, Semane B, Lin D, Vangronsveld J . Critical evaluation and statistical validation of a hydroponic culture system for Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2007; 46(2):212-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.09.014. View

5.
Munns R, Tester M . Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008; 59:651-81. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911. View