Shade Signals Alter the Expression of Circadian Clock Genes in Newly-formed Bioenergy Sorghum Internodes
Overview
Affiliations
Stem internodes of bioenergy sorghum inbred R.07020 are longer at high plant density (shade) than at low plant density (control). Initially, the youngest newly-formed subapical stem internodes of shade-treated and control plants are comparable in length. However, full-length internodes of shade-treated plants are three times longer than the internodes of the control plants. To identify the early molecular events associated with internode elongation in response to shade, we analyzed the transcriptome of the newly-formed internodes of shade-treated and control plants sampled between 4 and 6 hr after the start of the light period (14 hr light/10 hr dark). Sorghum genes homologous to the Arabidopsis shade marker genes and were not differentially expressed. The results indicate that shade signals promote internode elongation indirectly because sorghum internodes are not illuminated and grow while enclosed with leaf sheaths. Sorghum genes homologous to the Arabidopsis morning-phased circadian clock genes , , and were downregulated and evening-phased genes such as , and were upregulated in young internodes in response to shade. We hypothesize that a change in the function or patterns of expression of the circadian clock genes is the earliest molecular event associated with internode elongation in response to shade in bioenergy sorghum. Increased expression of , which promotes cell division, and decreased expression of cell wall-loosening and -like genes, which promote cell expansion, suggest that shade signals promote internode elongation in bioenergy sorghum in part through increasing cell number by delaying transition from cell division to cell expansion.
Spatially specific mechanisms and functions of the plant circadian clock.
Davis W, Endo M, Locke J Plant Physiol. 2022; 190(2):938-951.
PMID: 35640123 PMC: 9516738. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiac236.
Regulation of dhurrin pathway gene expression during Sorghum bicolor development.
Gleadow R, McKinley B, Blomstedt C, Lamb A, Moller B, Mullet J Planta. 2021; 254(6):119.
PMID: 34762174 PMC: 8585852. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-021-03774-2.
Fraser D, Panter P, Sharma A, Sharma B, Dodd A, Franklin K Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(27).
PMID: 34187900 PMC: 8271815. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2108176118.
Kebrom T, McKinley B, Mullet J Plant Direct. 2020; 4(6):e00235.
PMID: 32607464 PMC: 7315773. DOI: 10.1002/pld3.235.