» Articles » PMID: 32607153

Episodic Herbivory, Plant Density Dependence, and Stimulation of Aboveground Plant Production

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2020 Jul 2
PMID 32607153
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Herbivory is a major energy transfer within ecosystems; an open question is under what circumstances it can stimulate aboveground seasonal primary production. Despite multiple field demonstrations, past theory considered herbivory as a continuous process and found stimulation of seasonal production to be unlikely. Here, we report a new theoretical model that explores the consequences of discrete herbivory events, or episodes, separated in time. We discovered that negative density (biomass) dependence of plant growth, such as might be expected from resource limitation of plant growth, favors stimulation of seasonal production by infrequent herbivory events under a wide range of herbivory intensities and maximum plant relative growth rates. Results converge to those of previous models under repeated, short-interval herbivory, which generally reduces seasonal production. Model parameters were estimated with new and previous data from the Serengeti ecosystem. Patterns of observed frequent and large magnitude stimulated production in these data agreed generally with those predicted by the episodic herbivory model. The model thus may provide a new framework for evaluating the sustainability and impact of herbivory.

Citing Articles

Integrating defense and leaf economic spectrum traits in a tropical savanna plant.

Mohanbabu N, Veldhuis M, Jung D, Ritchie M Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1185616.

PMID: 37342149 PMC: 10277734. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1185616.


Density-dependent plant growth drives grazer stimulation of aboveground net primary production in Yellowstone grasslands.

Penner J, Frank D Oecologia. 2021; 196(3):851-861.

PMID: 34117517 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04960-5.


Episodic herbivory, plant density dependence, and stimulation of aboveground plant production.

Ritchie M, Penner J Ecol Evol. 2020; 10(12):5302-5314.

PMID: 32607153 PMC: 7319133. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6274.

References
1.
Rees M, Condit R, Crawley M, Pacala S, Tilman D . Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics. Science. 2001; 293(5530):650-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1062586. View

2.
Briske D . Grazing Optimization: A Plea for a Balanced Perspective. Ecol Appl. 1993; 3(1):24-26. DOI: 10.2307/1941784. View

3.
Hilbert D, Swift D, Detling J, Dyer M . Relative growth rates and the grazing optimization hypothesis. Oecologia. 2017; 51(1):14-18. DOI: 10.1007/BF00344645. View

4.
Ritchie M . Plant compensation to grazing and soil carbon dynamics in a tropical grassland. PeerJ. 2014; 2:e233. PMC: 3912448. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.233. View

5.
Alward R, Joern A . Plasticity and overcompensation in grass responses to herbivory. Oecologia. 2017; 95(3):358-364. DOI: 10.1007/BF00320989. View