» Articles » PMID: 32600473

Both the Presence of a Micropapillary Component and the Micropapillary Predominant Subtype Predict Poor Prognosis After Lung Adenocarcinoma Resection: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: It has been confirmed that the micropapillary (MP) pattern is a poor prognostic factor after resection of lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), but the proportion of the MP component as a prognostic criterion is still controversial. Hence, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate whether the presence of an MP component has equal prognostic power as the MP predominant subtype.

Methods: Literature retrieval was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases until December 23, 2019. Eligible studies were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included studies were divided into two subgroups, the MP component subgroup and the MP predominant subgroup, according to the proportion of the MP pattern to analyse the effect of this pattern on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted from each study. Review Manager 5.3 was used for statistical analyses.

Results: Finally, 10 studies, including a total of 4934 lung ADC patients, were included in this meta-analysis. Our results indicated a significantly worse pooled DFS (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.20-2.21) and OS (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.19-1.96) in the subgroup of MP predominant subtype patients. The pooled DFS (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.45-2.85) and OS (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.46-3.52) were also poor in the subgroup of patients with the presence of an MP component.

Conclusions: Both the presence of an MP component and the MP predominant subtype are related to poor DFS and OS after lung ADC resection and represent adverse prognostic factor for lung ADC patients. However, there are some limitations in this meta-analysis, and quantitative stratification based on the proportion of the MP component is needed to explore its effect on prognosis of lung ADC patients in the future.

Citing Articles

Application and progress of non-invasive imaging in predicting lung invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma under the new IASLC grading guidelines.

Feng J, Shao X, Gao J, Ge X, Sun Y, Shi Y Insights Imaging. 2025; 16(1):4.

PMID: 39747759 PMC: 11695567. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01877-4.


Predicting prognosis in patients with stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with a micropapillary component using a nomogram based on computed tomography radiomics and clinicopathologic factors: a retrospective analysis.

Li Y, Zhao J, Li R, Yao X, Dong X, Zhao Y Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024; 13(10):2585-2602.

PMID: 39507031 PMC: 11535836. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-24-544.


Predicting pathological grade of stage I pulmonary adenocarcinoma: a CT radiomics approach.

Huang X, Xue Y, Deng B, Chen J, Zou J, Tan H Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1406166.

PMID: 39399170 PMC: 11466725. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1406166.


The impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy on EGFR-mutated stage IA lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary pathological subtypes.

Cheng R, Hao Z, Qiu L, Zheng X, Huang S, Xian J World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):235.

PMID: 39232762 PMC: 11375949. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03429-y.


Sublobar resection for lung adenocarcinoma less than 2 cm containing solid or micropapillary components radiologically presented as consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) ≤0.25 [ground-glass opacity (GGO)].

Zhu M, Xu Y, Huang J, Yao Y, Tosi D, Koike T Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024; 13(7):1685-1694.

PMID: 39118896 PMC: 11304140. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-24-231.


References
1.
Zhang H, Lu C, Lu Y, Yu B, Lv F, Zhu Z . The predictive and prognostic values of factors associated with visceral pleural involvement in resected lung adenocarcinomas. Onco Targets Ther. 2016; 9:2337-48. PMC: 4844436. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S100965. View

2.
Lee J, Kim E, Kim M, Shim H . Genetic and clinicopathologic characteristics of lung adenocarcinoma with tumor spread through air spaces. Lung Cancer. 2018; 123:121-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.020. View

3.
Yi E, Bae M, Cho S, Chung J, Jheon S, Kim K . Pathological prognostic factors of recurrence in early stage lung adenocarcinoma. ANZ J Surg. 2017; 88(4):327-331. DOI: 10.1111/ans.14033. View

4.
Chao L, Yi-Sheng H, Yu C, Li-Xu Y, Xin-Lan L, Dong-Lan L . Relevance of EGFR mutation with micropapillary pattern according to the novel IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification and correlation with prognosis in Chinese patients. Lung Cancer. 2014; 86(2):164-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.08.018. View

5.
Song C, Kimura D, Sakai T, Tsushima T, Fukuda I . Novel approach for predicting occult lymph node metastasis in peripheral clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 2019; 11(4):1410-1420. PMC: 6531694. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.57. View