» Articles » PMID: 32596048

Beyond Polyphagy and Opportunism: Natural Prey of Hunting Spiders in the Canopy of Apple Trees

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2020 Jun 30
PMID 32596048
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Spiders (Araneae) form abundant and diverse assemblages in agroecosystems such as fruit orchards, and thus might have an important role as natural enemies of orchard pests. Although spiders are polyphagous and opportunistic predators in general, limited information exists on their natural prey at both species and community levels. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the natural prey (realized trophic niche) of arboreal hunting spiders, their role in trophic webs and their biological control potential with direct observation of predation events in apple orchards. Hunting spiders with prey in their chelicerae were collected in the canopy of apple trees in organic apple orchards in Hungary during the growing seasons between 2013 and 2019 and both spiders and their prey were identified and measured. Among others, the composition of the actual (captured by spiders) and the potential (available in the canopy) prey was compared, trophic niche and food web metrics were calculated, and some morphological, dimensional data of the spider-prey pairs were analyzed. Species-specific differences in prey composition or pest control ability were also discussed. By analyzing a total of 878 prey items captured by spiders, we concluded that arboreal hunting spiders forage selectively and consume a large number of apple pests; however, spiders' beneficial effects are greatly reduced by their high levels of intraguild predation and by a propensity to switch from pests to alternative prey. In this study, arboreal hunting spiders showed negative selectivity for pests, no selectivity for natural enemies and positive selectivity for neutral species. In the trophic web, the dominant hunting spider taxa/groups (, , spp., , spp. and 'Other salticids') exhibit different levels of predation on different prey groups and the trophic web's structure changes depending on the time of year. Hunting spiders show a high functional redundancy in their predation, but contrary to their polyphagous nature, the examined spider taxa showed differences in their natural diet, exhibited a certain degree of prey specialization and selected prey by size and taxonomic identity. Guilds (such as stalkers, ambushers and foliage runners) did not consistently predict either prey composition or predation selectivity of arboreal hunting spider species. From the economic standpoint, and spp. were found to be the most effective natural enemies of apple pests, especially of aphids. Finally, the trophic niche width of and increased during ontogeny, resulting in a shift in their predation. These results demonstrate how specific generalist predators can differ from each other in aspects of their predation ecology even within a relatively narrow taxonomic group.

Citing Articles

Natural toxins and One Health: a review.

Nwaji A, Arieri O, Anyang A, Nguedia K, Abiade E, Forcados G Sci One Health. 2024; 1:100013.

PMID: 39076609 PMC: 11262277. DOI: 10.1016/j.soh.2023.100013.


Tree species identity, canopy structure and prey availability differentially affect canopy spider diversity and trophic composition.

Wildermuth B, Donges C, Matevski D, Penanhoat A, Seifert C, Seidel D Oecologia. 2023; 203(1-2):37-51.

PMID: 37709958 PMC: 10615988. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-023-05447-1.


Sex-specific life-history strategies among immature jumping spiders: Differences in body parameters and behavior.

Mezofi L, Marko V, Taranyi D, Marko G Curr Zool. 2023; 69(5):535-551.

PMID: 37637309 PMC: 10449423. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoac069.


The ontogenetic dietary shift from non-dangerous to dangerous prey in predator-eating predators under capture risk.

Suzuki Y, Ikemoto M, Yokoi T Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(12):e9609.

PMID: 36514549 PMC: 9731918. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9609.


Molecular gut content analysis indicates the inter- and intra-guild predation patterns of spiders in conventionally managed vegetable fields.

Saqib H, Liang P, You M, Gurr G Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(14):9543-9552.

PMID: 34306641 PMC: 8293772. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7772.


References
1.
Michalko R, Pekar S . Different hunting strategies of generalist predators result in functional differences. Oecologia. 2016; 181(4):1187-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3631-4. View

2.
Roubinet E, Jonsson T, Malsher G, Staudacher K, Traugott M, Ekbom B . High Redundancy as well as Complementary Prey Choice Characterize Generalist Predator Food Webs in Agroecosystems. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):8054. PMC: 5966386. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26191-0. View

3.
Whitney T, Sitvarin M, Roualdes E, Bonner S, Harwood J . Selectivity underlies the dissociation between seasonal prey availability and prey consumption in a generalist predator. Mol Ecol. 2018; 27(7):1739-1748. DOI: 10.1111/mec.14554. View

4.
Eitzinger B, Abrego N, Gravel D, Huotari T, Vesterinen E, Roslin T . Assessing changes in arthropod predator-prey interactions through DNA-based gut content analysis-variable environment, stable diet. Mol Ecol. 2018; 28(2):266-280. DOI: 10.1111/mec.14872. View

5.
Pekar S, Coddington J, Blackledge T . Evolution of stenophagy in spiders (Araneae): evidence based on the comparative analysis of spider diets. Evolution. 2012; 66(3):776-806. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01471.x. View