» Articles » PMID: 24940885

Fish Predation by Semi-aquatic Spiders: a Global Pattern

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Jun 19
PMID 24940885
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

More than 80 incidences of fish predation by semi-aquatic spiders--observed at the fringes of shallow freshwater streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, swamps, and fens--are reviewed. We provide evidence that fish predation by semi-aquatic spiders is geographically widespread, occurring on all continents except Antarctica. Fish predation by spiders appears to be more common in warmer areas between 40° S and 40° N. The fish captured by spiders, usually ranging from 2-6 cm in length, are among the most common fish taxa occurring in their respective geographic area (e.g., mosquitofish [Gambusia spp.] in the southeastern USA, fish of the order Characiformes in the Neotropics, killifish [Aphyosemion spp.] in Central and West Africa, as well as Australian native fish of the genera Galaxias, Melanotaenia, and Pseudomugil). Naturally occurring fish predation has been witnessed in more than a dozen spider species from the superfamily Lycosoidea (families Pisauridae, Trechaleidae, and Lycosidae), in two species of the superfamily Ctenoidea (family Ctenidae), and in one species of the superfamily Corinnoidea (family Liocranidae). The majority of reports on fish predation by spiders referred to pisaurid spiders of the genera Dolomedes and Nilus (>75% of observed incidences). There is laboratory evidence that spiders from several more families (e.g., the water spider Argyroneta aquatica [Cybaeidae], the intertidal spider Desis marina [Desidae], and the 'swimming' huntsman spider Heteropoda natans [Sparassidae]) predate fish as well. Our finding of such a large diversity of spider families being engaged in fish predation is novel. Semi-aquatic spiders captured fish whose body length exceeded the spiders' body length (the captured fish being, on average, 2.2 times as long as the spiders). Evidence suggests that fish prey might be an occasional prey item of substantial nutritional importance.

Citing Articles

The influence of season, hunting mode, and habitat specialization on riparian spiders as key predators in the aquatic-terrestrial linkage.

Bollinger E, Zubrod J, Englert D, Graf N, Weisner O, Kolb S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22950.

PMID: 38135811 PMC: 10746743. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50420-w.


Microhabitat conditions drive uncertainty of risk and shape neophobic responses in Trinidadian guppies, .

Feyten L, Ramnarine I, Brown G Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(9):e10554.

PMID: 37753307 PMC: 10518753. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10554.


Composition and toxicity of venom produced by araneophagous white-tailed spiders (Lamponidae: Lampona sp.).

Michalek O, Walker A, Sedo O, Zdrahal Z, King G, Pekar S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):21597.

PMID: 36517485 PMC: 9751281. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24694-5.


Aerodynamics and the role of the earth's electric field in the spiders' ballooning flight.

Cho M J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2021; 207(2):219-236.

PMID: 33712884 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-021-01474-6.


Lizard predation by spiders: A review from the Neotropical and Andean regions.

Reyes-Olivares C, Guajardo-Santibanez A, Segura B, Zanartu N, Penna M, Labra A Ecol Evol. 2020; 10(20):10953-10964.

PMID: 33144940 PMC: 7593146. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6801.


References
1.
Seymour R, Hetz S . The diving bell and the spider: the physical gill of Argyroneta aquatica. J Exp Biol. 2011; 214(Pt 13):2175-81. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.056093. View

2.
Krebs J, Avery M . Chick growth and prey quality in the European Bee-eater (Merops apiaster). Oecologia. 2017; 64(3):363-368. DOI: 10.1007/BF00379134. View

3.
Hughes S . Effect of excess dietary riboflavin on growth of rainbow trout. J Nutr. 1984; 114(9):1660-3. DOI: 10.1093/jn/114.9.1660. View

4.
Comita G, Schindler D . Calorific Values of Microcrustacea. Science. 1963; 140(3574):1394-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.140.3574.1394. View

5.
Okorie A, Abiodun O . Laboratory evaluation of the biocontrol potential of Aphyosemion gularis against Anopheles larvae. J Vector Borne Dis. 2010; 47(3):181-4. View