Factors Associated with Abortion at 12 or More Weeks Gestation After Implementation of a Restrictive Texas Law
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To examine factors associated with obtaining abortion at 12 or more weeks gestation in Texas after implementation of a restrictive law.
Study Design: In this retrospective cohort study, we collected data from eight Texas abortion clinics that provided services at 12 or more weeks gestation from April 1, 2015 to March 30, 2016, after a restrictive abortion law enacted in November 2013 shuttered many of the state's clinics. We examined factors associated with obtaining in-clinic abortion services between 3-11 versus 12-24 weeks gestation including patient race-ethnicity, income level, and driving distance to the clinic using chi-square tests and calculating odds ratios. We further subcategorized abortion between 15-24 weeks to determine who may be most affected by a Texas law banning dilation and evacuation (D&E).
Results: Among 24,555 in-clinic abortions, 19.2% (n = 4,714) occurred at 12 or more weeks gestation. Compared to patients who obtained care between 3-11 weeks, those who obtained care at 12 or more weeks were more likely to be Black than White (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.05-1.31), live ≤110% of the federal poverty level than have higher income (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.94-2.26), and drive 50+ miles than 1-24 miles to obtain care (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.15-1.38). These associations remained for those obtaining care between 15-24 weeks. Even after adjusting for race-ethnicity and driving distance, low-income patients had greater odds of obtaining care in between 15-24 weeks (aOR 1.52; 95% CI 1.21-1.91).
Conclusions: Patients obtaining abortion at 12 or more weeks gestation in Texas are more likely to be Black, low-income, and travel far distances to obtain in-clinic care.
Implications: In Texas, patients who are Black, low-income, and travel the farthest are more likely to obtain in-clinic abortion between 15-24 weeks gestation, commonly performed via D&E. If Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB8) banning D&E goes into effect, these patients may be prevented from obtaining care.
A global scoping review of the circumstances of care seeking for abortion later in pregnancy.
Jacobson L, Darney B, Johnston H, Ganatra B PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(12):e0003965.
PMID: 39636911 PMC: 11620362. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003965.
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2022.
Ramer S, Nguyen A, Hollier L, Rodenhizer J, Warner L, Whiteman M MMWR Surveill Summ. 2024; 73(7):1-28.
PMID: 39602470 PMC: 11616987. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7307a1.
Dagnaw E, Berta M, Cherkos E, Mequannent E BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e081946.
PMID: 39572098 PMC: 11580306. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081946.
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2021.
Kortsmit K, Nguyen A, Mandel M, Hollier L, Ramer S, Rodenhizer J MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023; 72(9):1-29.
PMID: 37992038 PMC: 10684357. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7209a1.
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2020.
Kortsmit K, Nguyen A, Mandel M, Clark E, Hollier L, Rodenhizer J MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022; 71(10):1-27.
PMID: 36417304 PMC: 9707346. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7110a1.