» Articles » PMID: 26768858

Women's Experiences Seeking Abortion Care Shortly After the Closure of Clinics Due to a Restrictive Law in Texas

Overview
Journal Contraception
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2016 Jan 16
PMID 26768858
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In 2013, Texas passed legislation restricting abortion services. Almost half of the state's clinics had closed by April 2014, and there was a 13% decline in abortions in the 6 months after the first portions of the law went into effect, compared to the same period 1 year prior. We aimed to describe women's experiences seeking abortion care shortly after clinics closed and document pregnancy outcomes of women affected by these closures.

Study Design: Between November 2013 and November 2014, we recruited women who sought abortion care at Texas clinics that were no longer providing services. Some participants had appointments scheduled at clinics that stopped offering care when the law went into effect; others called seeking care at clinics that had closed. Texas resident women seeking abortion in Albuquerque, New Mexico, were also recruited.

Results: We conducted 23 in-depth interviews and performed a thematic analysis. As a result of clinic closures, women experienced confusion about where to go for abortion services, and most reported increased cost and travel time to obtain care. Having to travel farther for care also compromised their privacy. Eight women were delayed more than 1 week, two did not receive care until they were more than 12 weeks pregnant and two did not obtain their desired abortion at all. Five women considered self-inducing the abortion, but none attempted this.

Conclusions: The clinic closures resulted in multiple barriers to care, leading to delayed abortion care for some and preventing others from having the abortion they wanted.

Implications: The restrictions on abortion facilities that resulted in the closure of clinics in Texas created significant burdens on women that prevented them from having desired abortions. These laws may also adversely affect public health by moving women who would have had abortions in the first trimester to having second-trimester procedures.

Citing Articles

Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.

Weitz T Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024; 56(3):199-210.

PMID: 39537337 PMC: 11606007. DOI: 10.1111/psrh.12288.


Distance Traveled for Abortion at a North Carolina Tertiary Care Center Following Restrictive Legislation.

Brenner T, Stuart G, Rowe C, Diener Z N C Med J. 2024; 84(3):194-197.

PMID: 39302288 DOI: 10.18043/001c.74509.


The association between reproductive rights and access to abortion services and mental health among US women.

Liu S, Benny C, Grinshteyn E, Ehntholt A, Cook D, Pabayo R SSM Popul Health. 2023; 23:101428.

PMID: 37215399 PMC: 10199416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101428.


"Adoption is just not for me": How abortion patients in Michigan and New Mexico factor adoption into their pregnancy outcome decisions.

Fuentes L, Kavanaugh M, Frohwirth L, Jerman J, Blades N Contracept X. 2023; 5:100090.

PMID: 36923258 PMC: 10008919. DOI: 10.1016/j.conx.2023.100090.


Seeking abortion care in Ohio and Texas during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Carpenter E, Gyuras H, Burke K, Czarnecki D, Bessett D, McGowan M Contraception. 2022; 118:109896.

PMID: 36240904 PMC: 9554324. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.09.134.


References
1.
Jerman J, Jones R . Secondary measures of access to abortion services in the United States, 2011 and 2012: gestational age limits, cost, and harassment. Womens Health Issues. 2014; 24(4):e419-24. PMC: 4946165. DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.05.002. View

2.
Roberts S, Biggs M, Chibber K, Gould H, Rocca C, Foster D . Risk of violence from the man involved in the pregnancy after receiving or being denied an abortion. BMC Med. 2014; 12:144. PMC: 4182793. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-014-0144-z. View

3.
Kimport K, Preskill F, Cockrill K, Weitz T . Women's perspectives on ultrasound viewing in the abortion care context. Womens Health Issues. 2012; 22(6):e513-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.09.001. View

4.
Grossman D, Baum S, Fuentes L, White K, Hopkins K, Stevenson A . Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas. Contraception. 2014; 90(5):496-501. PMC: 4179978. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.006. View

5.
Kavanagh E, Hasselbacher L, Betham B, Tristan S, Gilliam M . Abortion-seeking minors' views on the Illinois parental notification law: a qualitative study. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44(3):159-66. DOI: 10.1363/4415912. View