Global Variations in Practices Concerning Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-an Online Survey of 651 Bariatric and Metabolic Surgeons with Cumulative Experience of 158,335 Procedures
Overview
Affiliations
Introduction: There is significant variation in practices concerning Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) among bariatric surgeons, but there is currently a lack of robust data on the nature and extent of these variations. The purpose of this study was to understand global variations in practices concerning RYGB.
Methods: A questionnaire-based survey on Survey Monkey® was created, and the link was shared freely on various social media platforms. The link was also distributed through a personnel email network of authors.
Results: A total of 657 surgeons from 65 countries completed the survey. Crohn's disease and liver cirrhosis were considered absolute contraindications for RYGB by 427 surgeons (64.98%) and 347 surgeons (53.30%), respectively. More than 68.5% of surgeons performed routine upper GI endoscopy while 64.17% performed routine ultrasound of abdomen preoperatively. The majority of surgeons (77.70%) used the perigastric technique for Gastric pouch creation. Approximately, 79.5% used orogastric bougie. More than 70% of the respondents did not use any staple line reinforcement routinely. Only 17.67% of surgeons measured the whole small bowel length, and the majority of surgeons (86.5%) used constant length of BP limb. Approximately, 89% used constant length of alimentary limb. Approximately, 95% of surgeons preferred antecolic bypass, and more than 86% routinely closed the Petersen defect. Marginal ulcer prophylaxis was used by the majority (91.17%). Almost 95% of surgeons recommended lifelong vitamin and mineral supplements.
Conclusion: This survey identifies global variations in practices concerning RYGB. It identifies several areas for future research and consensus building.
Hafermann J, Phelps J, Tayash M J Robot Surg. 2025; 19(1):65.
PMID: 39921831 PMC: 11807049. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02223-6.
Welbourn R, Nevins E, Mahawar K Obes Surg. 2024; 34(9):3145-3146.
PMID: 39060639 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07397-w.
[Anastomotic techniques in minimally invasive bariatric surgery].
Lange U, Mehdorn M, Dietrich A Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023; 94(9):768-774.
PMID: 37367961 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-023-01907-9.
[Current evidence on loop length in intestinal bypass procedures].
Seidemann L, Moulla Y, Dietrich A Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023; 94(6):506-511.
PMID: 36894649 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-023-01842-9.
Romeijn M, Van Hoef S, Janssen L, van de Pas K, van Dielen F, Luijten A Obes Surg. 2021; 31(8):3579-3587.
PMID: 33905068 PMC: 8270800. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05436-4.