» Articles » PMID: 33578635

Bariatric Surgery-How Much Malabsorption Do We Need?-A Review of Various Limb Lengths in Different Gastric Bypass Procedures

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Feb 13
PMID 33578635
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The number of obese individuals worldwide continues to increase every year, thus, the number of bariatric/metabolic operations performed is on a constant rise as well. Beside exclusively restrictive procedures, most of the bariatric operations have a more or less malabsorptive component. Several different bypass procedures exist alongside each other today and each type of bypass is performed using a distinct technique. Furthermore, the length of the bypassed intestine may differ as well. One might add that the operations are performed differently in different parts of the world and have been changing and evolving over time. This review evaluates the most frequently performed bariatric bypass procedures (and their variations) worldwide: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass, Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass + Sleeve Gastrectomy, Biliopancreatic Diversion + Duodenal Switch and operations due to weight regain. The evaluation of the procedures and different limb lengths focusses on weight loss, remission of comorbidities and the risk of malnutrition and deficiencies. This narrative review does not aim at synthesizing quantitative data. Rather, it provides a summary of carefully selected, high-quality studies to serve as examples and to draw tentative conclusions on the effects of the bypass procedures mentioned above. In conclusion, it is important to carefully choose the procedure and small bowel length excluded from the food passage suited best to each individual patient. A balance has to be achieved between sufficient weight loss and remission of comorbidities, as well as a low risk of deficiencies and malnutrition. In any case, at least 300 cm of small bowel should always remain in the food stream to prevent the development of deficiencies and malnutrition.

Citing Articles

Bariatric nutrition and evaluation of the metabolic surgical patient: Update to the 2022 Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) bariatric surgery, gastrointestinal hormones, and the microbiome clinical practice statement (CPS).

Benson-Davies S, Frederiksen K, Patel R Obes Pillars. 2025; 13:100154.

PMID: 39758884 PMC: 11697792. DOI: 10.1016/j.obpill.2024.100154.


A Meta-Analysis Comparing RYGB with Long Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) Versus Long Alimentary Limb (AL) in Groups with Equal or Nearly Equal Combined Bypass Lengths (Combined BPL and AL Lengths): Does Switching Seats Enhance Weight Loss?.

Diab A, Sujka J, McCaskey A, Thompson A, Elnagi A, Docimo S Obes Surg. 2024; 34(12):4531-4540.

PMID: 39446291 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07556-z.


Understanding and Managing Metabolic Deficiencies Post Bariatric and Esophagectomy Surgeries: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Daniel M, Al Dhib R, Mendoza M, Tisekar S, Cingireddy A, Essani B Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60192.

PMID: 38868292 PMC: 11168022. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60192.


Prevention of malnutrition after one anastomosis gastric bypass: value of the common channel limb length.

Mostafapour E, Shahsavan M, Shahmiri S, Jawhar N, Ghanem O, Kermansaravi M BMC Surg. 2024; 24(1):156.

PMID: 38755612 PMC: 11097460. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02438-8.


Technical Considerations in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-the Israeli Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Experience.

Abu-Abeid A, Yuval J, Keidar A, Nizri E, Lahat G, Eldar S Obes Surg. 2024; 34(7):2356-2362.

PMID: 38649670 PMC: 11217076. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07223-3.


References
1.
Ghiassi S, Higa K, Chang S, Ma P, Lloyd A, Boone K . Conversion of standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to distal bypass for weight loss failure and metabolic syndrome: 3-year follow-up and evolution of technique to reduce nutritional complications. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018; 14(5):554-561. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.004. View

2.
Moon R, Gaskins L, Teixeira A, Jawad M . Safety and Effectiveness of Single-Anastomosis Duodenal Switch Procedure: 2-Year Result from a Single US Institution. Obes Surg. 2017; 28(6):1571-1577. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-3066-y. View

3.
Jedamzik J, Eilenberg M, Felsenreich D, Krebs M, Ranzenberger-Haider T, Langer F . Impact of limb length on nutritional status in one-anastomosis gastric bypass: 3-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020; 16(4):476-484. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.012. View

4.
Schauer P, Bhatt D, Kirwan J, Wolski K, Aminian A, Brethauer S . Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes - 5-Year Outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(7):641-651. PMC: 5451258. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600869. View

5.
Surve A, Cottam D, Medlin W, Richards C, Belnap L, Horsley B . Long-term outcomes of primary single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020; 16(11):1638-1646. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.07.019. View