» Articles » PMID: 32584635

Voluntary Modification of Rapid Tactile-motor Responses During Reaching Differs from Its Visuomotor Counterpart

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2020 Jun 26
PMID 32584635
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

People commonly hold and manipulate a variety of objects in everyday life, and these objects have different physical properties. To successfully control this wide range of objects, people must associate new patterns of tactile stimuli with appropriate motor outputs. We performed a series of experiments investigating the extent to which people can voluntarily modify tactile-motor associations in the context of a rapid tactile-motor response guiding the hand to a moving target (previously described in Pruszynski JA, Johansson RS, Flanagan JR. 26: 788-792, 2016) by using an anti-reach paradigm in which participants were instructed to move their hands in the opposite direction of a target jump. We compared performance to that observed when people make visually guided reaches to a moving target (cf. Day BL, Lyon IN. 130: 159-168, 2000; Pisella L, Grea H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y. 3: 729-736, 2000). When participants had visual feedback, motor responses during the anti-reach task showed early automatic responses toward the moving target before later modification to move in the instructed direction. When the same participants had only tactile feedback, however, they were able to suppress this early phase of the motor response, which occurs <100 ms after the target jump. Our results indicate that while the tactile motor and visual motor systems both support rapid responses that appear similar under some conditions, the circuits underlying responses show sharp distinctions in terms of their malleability. When people reach toward a visual target that moves suddenly, they automatically correct their reach to follow the object; even when explicitly instructed not to follow a moving visual target, people exhibit an initial incorrect movement before moving in the correct direction. We show that when people use tactile feedback, they do not show an initial incorrect response, even though early muscle activity still occurs.

Citing Articles

Done in 65 ms: Express Visuomotor Responses in Upper Limb Muscles in Rhesus Macaques.

Cecala A, Kozak R, Pruszynski J, Corneil B eNeuro. 2023; 10(8).

PMID: 37507227 PMC: 10449271. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0078-23.2023.


Efference copy in kinesthetic perception: a copy of what is it?.

Latash M J Neurophysiol. 2021; 125(4):1079-1094.

PMID: 33566734 PMC: 8282223. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00545.2020.

References
1.
Johansson R, Westling G . Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1988; 71(1):72-86. DOI: 10.1007/BF00247523. View

2.
Muraoka T, Kurtzer I . Spinal Circuits Mediate a Stretch Reflex Between the Upper Limbs in Humans. Neuroscience. 2020; 431:115-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.02.007. View

3.
Saijo N, Murakami I, Nishida S, Gomi H . Large-field visual motion directly induces an involuntary rapid manual following response. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(20):4941-51. PMC: 6724847. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4143-04.2005. View

4.
Day B, Lyon I . Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 130(2):159-68. DOI: 10.1007/s002219900218. View

5.
Prochazka A, Clarac F, Loeb G, Rothwell J, Wolpaw J . What do reflex and voluntary mean? Modern views on an ancient debate. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 130(4):417-32. DOI: 10.1007/s002219900250. View