» Articles » PMID: 15901775

Large-field Visual Motion Directly Induces an Involuntary Rapid Manual Following Response

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2005 May 20
PMID 15901775
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent neuroscience studies have been concerned with how aimed movements are generated on the basis of target localization. However, visual information from the surroundings as well as from the target can influence arm motor control, in a manner similar to known effects in postural and ocular motor control. Here, we show an ultra-fast manual motor response directly induced by a large-field visual motion. This rapid response aided reaction when the subject moved his hand in the direction of visual motion, suggesting assistive visually evoked manual control during postural movement. The latency of muscle activity generating this response was as short as that of the ocular following responses to the visual motion. Abrupt visual motion entrained arm movement without affecting perceptual target localization, and the degrees of motion coherence and speed of the visual stimulus modulated this arm response. This visuomotor behavior was still observed when the visual motion was confined to the "follow-through" phase of a hitting movement, in which no target existed. An analysis of the arm movements suggests that the hitting follow through made by the subject is not a part of a reaching movement. Moreover, the arm response was systematically modulated by hand bias forces, suggesting that it results from a reflexive control mechanism. We therefore propose that its mechanism is radically distinct from motor control for aimed movements to a target. Rather, in an analogy with reflexive eye movement stabilizing a retinal image, we consider that this mechanism regulates arm movements in parallel with voluntary motor control.

Citing Articles

Body-Related Visual Biasing Affects Accuracy of Reaching.

Beazley C, Giannoni S, Ionta S Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766469 PMC: 11675064. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121270.


Inverse relation between motion perception and postural responses induced by motion of a touched object.

Takamuku S, Struckova B, Bancroft M, Gomi H, Haggard P, Kaski D Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1395.

PMID: 39462096 PMC: 11513030. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07093-6.


Visually induced involuntary arm, head, and torso movements.

Martin A, Bakshi A, Ventura J, Panic A, Lackner J Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(11):2557-2572.

PMID: 39292248 PMC: 11527965. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06913-9.


Done in 65 ms: Express Visuomotor Responses in Upper Limb Muscles in Rhesus Macaques.

Cecala A, Kozak R, Pruszynski J, Corneil B eNeuro. 2023; 10(8).

PMID: 37507227 PMC: 10449271. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0078-23.2023.


Slightly perturbing the arm influences choices between multiple targets.

Hadjipanayi V, Brenner E, Crowe E Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(6):1777-1783.

PMID: 36854925 PMC: 10545590. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02680-x.


References
1.
Coltz J, JOHNSON M, Ebner T . Cerebellar Purkinje cell simple spike discharge encodes movement velocity in primates during visuomotor arm tracking. J Neurosci. 1999; 19(5):1782-803. PMC: 6782164. View

2.
Nishida S, Johnston A . Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature. 1999; 397(6720):610-2. DOI: 10.1038/17600. View

3.
Kakei S, Hoffman D, Strick P . Muscle and movement representations in the primary motor cortex. Science. 1999; 285(5436):2136-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.285.5436.2136. View

4.
Kawato M . Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999; 9(6):718-27. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8. View

5.
Day B, Lyon I . Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 130(2):159-68. DOI: 10.1007/s002219900218. View