» Articles » PMID: 32584042

Nanomedicine for Acute Brain Injuries: Insight from Decades of Cancer Nanomedicine

Overview
Journal Mol Pharm
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2020 Jun 26
PMID 32584042
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acute brain injuries such as traumatic brain injury and stroke affect 85 million people a year worldwide, and many survivors suffer from long-term physical, cognitive, or psychosocial impairments. There are few FDA-approved therapies that are effective at preventing, halting, or ameliorating the state of disease in the brain after acute brain injury. To address this unmet need, one potential strategy is to leverage the unique physical and biological properties of nanomaterials. Decades of cancer nanomedicine research can serve as a blueprint for innovation in brain injury nanomedicines, both to emulate the successes and also to avoid potential pitfalls. In this review, we discuss how shared disease physiology between cancer and acute brain injuries can inform the design of novel nanomedicines for acute brain injuries. These disease hallmarks include dysregulated vasculature, an altered microenvironment, and changes in the immune system. We discuss several nanomaterial strategies that can be engineered to exploit these disease hallmarks, for example, passive accumulation, active targeting of disease-associated signals, bioresponsive designs that are "smart", and immune interactions.

Citing Articles

PEGylated Multimeric RNA Nanoparticles for siRNA Delivery in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Han S, Yoo W, Carton O, Joo J, Kwon E Small. 2024; 21(10):e2405806.

PMID: 39498752 PMC: 11899522. DOI: 10.1002/smll.202405806.


Reprograming Clots for In Vivo Chemical Targeting in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Kandell R, Wu J, Kwon E Adv Mater. 2024; 36(31):e2301738.

PMID: 38780012 PMC: 11293973. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202301738.


Drug delivery to the central nervous system.

Nance E, Pun S, Saigal R, Sellers D Nat Rev Mater. 2024; 7(4):314-331.

PMID: 38464996 PMC: 10923597. DOI: 10.1038/s41578-021-00394-w.


Analysis of PEG-lipid anchor length on lipid nanoparticle pharmacokinetics and activity in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury.

Waggoner L, Miyasaki K, Kwon E Biomater Sci. 2023; 11(12):4238-4253.

PMID: 36987922 PMC: 10262813. DOI: 10.1039/d2bm01846b.


Role of autophagy and transcriptome regulation in acute brain injury.

Arruri V, Vemuganti R Exp Neurol. 2022; 352:114032.

PMID: 35259350 PMC: 9187300. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.114032.


References
1.
Li M, Li J, Chen J, Liu Y, Cheng X, Yang F . Platelet Membrane Biomimetic Magnetic Nanocarriers for Targeted Delivery and Generation of Nitric Oxide in Early Ischemic Stroke. ACS Nano. 2020; 14(2):2024-2035. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b08587. View

2.
Gonul E, Duz B, Kahraman S, Kayali H, Kubar A, Timurkaynak E . Early pericyte response to brain hypoxia in cats: an ultrastructural study. Microvasc Res. 2002; 64(1):116-9. DOI: 10.1006/mvre.2002.2413. View

3.
Cunningham T, Cartagena C, Lu X, Konopko M, Dave J, Tortella F . Correlations between blood-brain barrier disruption and neuroinflammation in an experimental model of penetrating ballistic-like brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013; 31(5):505-14. PMC: 3934583. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.2965. View

4.
Xu W, Zhang Y, Su J, Liu A, Wang K, Li C . Ischemia Reperfusion Injury after Gradual versus Rapid Flow Restoration for Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Rats. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):1638. PMC: 5786000. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20095-9. View

5.
Herson P, Traystman R . Animal models of stroke: translational potential at present and in 2050. Future Neurol. 2014; 9(5):541-551. PMC: 4266275. DOI: 10.2217/fnl.14.44. View