» Articles » PMID: 32575657

Changes in Bull Semen Metabolome in Relation to Cryopreservation and Fertility

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2020 Jun 25
PMID 32575657
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Semen cryopreservation determines several sperm damages, including the loss of fertility-associated proteins. The purpose of the study was to compare the metabolite contents in bovine sperm and seminal plasma before and after cryopreservation, and between high- and low-fertility bulls in vitro. Forty-eight ejaculates, collected from eight bulls (six per bull), were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Cryopreservation resulted in an over-expression of lysophosphatidylcholine (0:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)) in seminal plasma. In addition, higher levels of glycine betaine and pyro-l-glutaminyl-l-glutamine were observed in cryopreserved compared to fresh spermatozoa. The fresh seminal plasma of high-fertility bulls showed an over-expression of l-acetylcarnitine, glycerol tripropanoate, 2,3-diacetoxypropyl stearate and glycerophosphocholine, and an under-expression of lysophosphatidylcholine and butyrylcarnitine, compared to low-fertility bulls. Higher levels of glycerophosphocholine and lysophosphatidylcholine (16:0/0:0) were recorded in fresh spermatozoa from high-fertility bulls. In high-fertility bulls, a greater content of glycerophosphocholine and lower levels of butyrylcarnitine, glycine betaine and l-carnitine were found in cryopreserved seminal plasma, and lower levels of glycine betaine were detected in cryopreserved spermatozoa. In conclusion, cryopreservation affects bovine semen metabolome at both plasmatic and cellular compartments, and metabolic profile differs between high- and low-fertility bulls.

Citing Articles

Abnormalities in mitochondrial energy metabolism induced by cryopreservation negatively affect goat sperm motility.

Zang S, Zou S, Chen X, Pan B, Ning A, Qin J Front Vet Sci. 2025; 11():1514362.

PMID: 39834931 PMC: 11743635. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1514362.


Effect of Seminal Plasma on the Freezability of Boar Sperm.

Zhu K, Song Y, He Z, Wang P, Wang X, Liu G Animals (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39765560 PMC: 11672632. DOI: 10.3390/ani14243656.


Effect of cryopreservation and semen extender on extracellular vesicles isolated from bull semen.

Capra E, Frigerio R, Lazzari B, Turri F, Gaspari G, Pascucci L Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1437410.

PMID: 39139604 PMC: 11321215. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1437410.


Proteomics and Metabolic Characteristics of Boar Seminal Plasma Extracellular Vesicles Reveal Biomarker Candidates Related to Sperm Motility.

Zhang Y, Ding N, Cao J, Zhang J, Liu J, Zhang C J Proteome Res. 2024; 23(9):3764-3779.

PMID: 39067049 PMC: 11385425. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00060.


Factors affecting the embryo production in buffalo (): A review.

Kumar S, Chaves M, da Silva A, Vale W, Rolim Filho S, Ferreira-Silva J Vet Med (Praha). 2024; 68(2):45-56.

PMID: 38332761 PMC: 10847820. DOI: 10.17221/48/2022-VETMED.


References
1.
Brown K, Crabo B, Graham E, Pace M . Some factors affecting loss of intracellular enzymes from spermatozoa. Cryobiology. 1971; 8(2):220-4. DOI: 10.1016/0011-2240(71)90030-7. View

2.
Dunn W, Bailey N, Johnson H . Measuring the metabolome: current analytical technologies. Analyst. 2005; 130(5):606-25. DOI: 10.1039/b418288j. View

3.
Rivera-Egea R, Garrido N, Sota N, Meseguer M, Remohi J, Dominguez F . Sperm lipidic profiles differ significantly between ejaculates resulting in pregnancy or not following intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35(11):1973-1985. PMC: 6240537. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1284-4. View

4.
Stradaioli G, Sylla L, Zelli R, Chiodi P, Monaci M . Effect of L-carnitine administration on the seminal characteristics of oligoasthenospermic stallions. Theriogenology. 2004; 62(3-4):761-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.11.018. View

5.
Dogan S, Mason M, Govindaraju A, Belser L, Kaya A, Stokes J . Interrelationships between apoptosis and fertility in bull sperm. J Reprod Dev. 2012; 59(1):18-26. PMC: 3943226. DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2012-068. View