» Articles » PMID: 32573516

The Expression of Dynamin 1, 2, and 3 in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Patient Prognosis

Overview
Journal Med Sci Monit
Date 2020 Jun 24
PMID 32573516
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BACKGROUND The classical dynamin family consists of dynamin 1, 2, and 3, which have different expression levels in different tissues to regulate cell membrane fission and endocytosis. Recent studies have reported increased expression of dynamins in human cancer, but their expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains to be determined. This study aimed to investigate the expression of dynamin 1, 2, and 3 in tissue sections of human HCC using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry. MATERIAL AND METHODS The expression of dynamin 1, 2, and 3 were investigated in 192 cases of HCC and 14 paired samples of HCC and adjacent normal liver tissue by qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. The clinical significance of dynamin 1, 2, and 3 were determined by correlating their expression levels with patient clinicopathological factors and survival rates. Independent prognostic factors were determined using the Cox regression hazard model. RESULTS In tissue samples from 192 patients with HCC, the expression of dynamin 1, 2, and 3 were upregulated in 41.15%, 29.69%, and 8.33% of cases, respectively. Dynamin 1 had a significantly increased mRNA expression level in HCC compared with adjacent normal liver tissues and was significantly correlated with alpha fetoprotein (AFP) levels, T stage, and TNM stage. Only dynamin 1 expression was correlated with the reduced overall survival (OS), and was identified as an independent prognostic biomarker of human HCC. CONCLUSIONS Upregulation of dynamin 1 at the protein and mRNA level was an independent prognostic biomarker of reduced OS in patients with HCC.

Citing Articles

Multiple machine-learning tools identifying prognostic biomarkers for acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Cheng Y, Yang X, Wang Y, Li Q, Chen W, Dai R BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):2.

PMID: 38167056 PMC: 10759623. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02408-9.


Cancer as a biophysical disease: Targeting the mechanical-adaptability program.

Nguyen L, Jacob M, Parajon E, Robinson D Biophys J. 2022; 121(19):3573-3585.

PMID: 35505610 PMC: 9617128. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.04.039.


Exosomal microRNA-23a-3p contributes to the progression of cholangiocarcinoma by interaction with Dynamin3.

Ni Q, Zhang H, Shi X, Li X Bioengineered. 2022; 13(3):6208-6221.

PMID: 35200104 PMC: 8973721. DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2037249.


DNM1: A Prognostic Biomarker Associated with Immune Infiltration in Colon Cancer-A Study Based on TCGA Database.

Hu M, Gu J, Su W, Zhang Z, Zhu B, Wang Q Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021:4896106.

PMID: 34888380 PMC: 8651384. DOI: 10.1155/2021/4896106.

References
1.
Khan I, Gril B, Steeg P . Metastasis Suppressors NME1 and NME2 Promote Dynamin 2 Oligomerization and Regulate Tumor Cell Endocytosis, Motility, and Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2019; 79(18):4689-4702. PMC: 8288561. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0492. View

2.
Zhou Y, Cao L, Li B, Zhang R, Sui C, Yin Z . Clinicopathological significance of ZEB1 protein in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 19(5):1700-6. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1772-6. View

3.
Takei K, Slepnev V, Haucke V, De Camilli P . Functional partnership between amphiphysin and dynamin in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat Cell Biol. 1999; 1(1):33-9. DOI: 10.1038/9004. View

4.
Chernikova S, Nguyen R, Truong J, Mello S, Stafford J, Hay M . Dynamin impacts homology-directed repair and breast cancer response to chemotherapy. J Clin Invest. 2018; 128(12):5307-5321. PMC: 6264728. DOI: 10.1172/JCI87191. View

5.
Kudo M, Finn R, Qin S, Han K, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F . Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018; 391(10126):1163-1173. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1. View