» Articles » PMID: 32552016

Nonrelocatable Occupations at Increased Risk During Pandemics: United States, 2018

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Jun 20
PMID 32552016
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To characterize which occupations in the United States could likely work from home during a pandemic such as COVID-19. I merged 2018 US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) national employment and wage data with measures ranking the importance of computer use at work and the importance of working with or performing for the public from the BLS O*NET survey. Approximately 25% (35.6 million) of US workers are employed in occupations (such as technology, administrative, financial, and engineering) that could be done from home; the remaining 75% work in occupations (including health care, manufacturing, retail, and food services) that are challenging to do from home. Most US workers are employed in occupations that cannot be done at home, putting 108.4 million workers at increased risk for adverse health outcomes related to working during a pandemic. These workers tend to be lower paid. The stress experienced by lower-income groups, coupled with job insecurity, could result in a large burden of mental health disorders in the United States in addition to increased cases of COVID-19 from workplace transmission.

Citing Articles

Psychiatric Epidemiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Eisenberg-Guyot J, Presskreischer R, Pamplin 2nd J Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025; 11(2):120-130.

PMID: 39803610 PMC: 11720142. DOI: 10.1007/s40471-024-00342-6.


Impacts of COVID-19 shelter in place across key life domains among immigrant farmworker Latina mothers and young adults.

Bakal M, Ambriz E, Ortiz-Pivaral L, Kogut K, Rood C, Rauch S BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2036.

PMID: 39080610 PMC: 11287914. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19438-1.


Resilience during lockdown: a longitudinal study investigating changes in behaviour and attitudes among older females during COVID-19 lockdown in the UK.

Li L, Sullivan A, Musah A, Stavrianaki K, Wood C, Baker P BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1967.

PMID: 39044166 PMC: 11267972. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19480-z.


Description of control measures, attitudes, and behaviours at a scientific conference with a confirmed COVID-19 case but no reported onward transmission, November 2021 England.

Wrenn K, Blomquist P, Manley P, Yuan J, Gilham E, Higgins H Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024; 8:100521.

PMID: 39027345 PMC: 11255120. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100521.


A SARS-CoV-2 outbreak investigation at a storage and distribution centre in England: an assessment of worker- and workplace-related risk factors.

Raja A, Nicholls G, Coldwell M, van Veldhoven K, Sandys V, Atkinson B Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9561.

PMID: 38671031 PMC: 11053053. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60194-4.


References
1.
Benach J, Vives A, Amable M, Vanroelen C, Tarafa G, Muntaner C . Precarious employment: understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014; 35:229-53. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182500. View

2.
Baker M, Peckham T, Seixas N . Estimating the burden of United States workers exposed to infection or disease: A key factor in containing risk of COVID-19 infection. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0232452. PMC: 7188235. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232452. View

3.
Michaud P, Crimmins E, Hurd M . The Effect of Job Loss on Health: Evidence from Biomarkers. Labour Econ. 2017; 41:194-203. PMC: 5495022. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2016.05.014. View

4.
Podgursky M, Swaim P . Health insurance loss: the case of the displaced worker. Mon Labor Rev. 1987; 110(4):30-3. View

5.
Burgard S, Brand J, House J . Perceived job insecurity and worker health in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 69(5):777-85. PMC: 2757283. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.029. View