» Articles » PMID: 29115198

The Consequences of Unemployment on Diet Composition and Purchase Behaviour: a Longitudinal Study from Denmark

Overview
Date 2017 Nov 9
PMID 29115198
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore and describe quantitatively the effect over time of unemployment on food purchase behaviour and diet composition.

Design: Longitudinal data from 2008-2012, with monthly food purchase data aligned with register data on unemployment measured as a dichotomous indicator as well as a trend accounting for the duration.

Setting: A household panel which registers daily food purchases combined with detailed nutritional information and registration of the duration of unemployment at individual level. The structure of the data set facilitates the detection of effects or associations between duration of unemployment and diet composition, purchase behaviour in terms of food expenditure, and share of food purchased on offer and in discounters while controlling for important confounding factors.

Subjects: Danish households of working age (n 3440) adjusted to household equivalents. We use fixed-effects econometric methods to control for unobserved heterogeneity.

Results: In the short run, unemployment led to substitution in favour of discount stores and increases in food expenditure and in consumption of saturated fat, total fat and protein due to increased consumption of animal-based foods. In the medium run food expenditure declined together with consumption of fresh animal-based foods and saturated fat, total fat and protein. In the even longer run these nutrients were substituted by carbohydrates and added sugar.

Conclusions: Unemployment has a substantial influence on diet composition, but effects vary with duration of the unemployment period, which may have potential health implications. This ought to be taken into consideration in evaluations of existing reforms and in future reforms of welfare systems.

Citing Articles

A Comparative Survey on Daily Health Habits Among iPhone and Android Smartphone Users.

Ungerer M, Gumbinger C Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024; :15598276241268195.

PMID: 39554924 PMC: 11562268. DOI: 10.1177/15598276241268195.


The Interplay of Dietary Habits, Economic Factors, and Globalization: Assessing the Role of Institutional Quality.

Azimi M, Rahman M, Maraseni T Nutrients. 2024; 16(18).

PMID: 39339718 PMC: 11435435. DOI: 10.3390/nu16183116.


Changing sustainable diet behaviours during the COVID-19 Pandemic: inequitable outcomes across a sociodemographically diverse sample of adults.

Ludwig-Borycz E, Baylin A, Jones A, Webster A, Stratton A, Bauer K J Nutr Sci. 2024; 13():e16.

PMID: 38572371 PMC: 10988137. DOI: 10.1017/jns.2024.9.


Cohort profile: The Health, Food, Purchases and Lifestyle (SMIL) cohort - a Danish open cohort.

Sorensen K, Andersen M, Moller F, Eves C, Junker T, Zareini B BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e078773.

PMID: 38508644 PMC: 10961505. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078773.


Association between glycaemic control and malnutrition in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.

Thaenpramun R, Komolsuradej N, Buathong N, Srikrajang S Br J Nutr. 2024; 131(9):1497-1505.

PMID: 38239007 PMC: 11043908. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114524000175.


References
1.
Asgeirsdottir T, Corman H, Noonan K, Olafsdottir B, Reichman N . Was the economic crisis of 2008 good for Icelanders? Impact on health behaviors. Econ Hum Biol. 2013; 13:1-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2013.03.005. View

2.
Dave D, Kelly I . How does the business cycle affect eating habits?. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 74(2):254-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.005. View

3.
Asgeirsdottir T, Corman H, Noonan K, Reichman N . Lifecycle effects of a recession on health behaviors: Boom, bust, and recovery in Iceland. Econ Hum Biol. 2015; 20:90-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2015.11.001. View

4.
Andrieu E, Darmon N, Drewnowski A . Low-cost diets: more energy, fewer nutrients. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005; 60(3):434-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602331. View

5.
Ruhm C . Healthy living in hard times. J Health Econ. 2005; 24(2):341-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.007. View