» Articles » PMID: 32547596

Gene Regulatory Network Inference: Connecting Plant Biology and Mathematical Modeling

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2020 Jun 18
PMID 32547596
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plant responses to environmental and intrinsic signals are tightly controlled by multiple transcription factors (TFs). These TFs and their regulatory connections form gene regulatory networks (GRNs), which provide a blueprint of the transcriptional regulations underlying plant development and environmental responses. This review provides examples of experimental methodologies commonly used to identify regulatory interactions and generate GRNs. Additionally, this review describes network inference techniques that leverage gene expression data to predict regulatory interactions. These computational and experimental methodologies yield complex networks that can identify new regulatory interactions, driving novel hypotheses. Biological properties that contribute to the complexity of GRNs are also described in this review. These include network topology, network size, transient binding of TFs to DNA, and competition between multiple upstream regulators. Finally, this review highlights the potential of machine learning approaches to leverage gene expression data to predict phenotypic outputs.

Citing Articles

Dynamic Intervention in Gene Regulatory Networks: A Partially Observed Zero-Sum Markov Game.

Hosseini S, Imani M Control Technol Appl. 2025; 2024():774-781.

PMID: 39845773 PMC: 11753801. DOI: 10.1109/ccta60707.2024.10666558.


Machine Learning Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks in Developing Seeds.

Tucci A, Flores-Vergara M, Franks R Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39683091 PMC: 11644258. DOI: 10.3390/plants13233297.


An optimal Bayesian intervention policy in response to unknown dynamic cell stimuli.

Hosseini S, Imani M Inf Sci (N Y). 2024; 666.

PMID: 39464381 PMC: 11507472. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2024.120440.


Understanding developmental system drift.

McColgan A, DiFrisco J Development. 2024; 151(20).

PMID: 39417684 PMC: 11529278. DOI: 10.1242/dev.203054.


Genomic and cell-specific regulation of benzylisoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis in opium poppy.

Hong U, Tamiru-Oli M, Hurgobin B, Lewsey M J Exp Bot. 2024; 76(1):35-51.

PMID: 39046316 PMC: 11659185. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erae317.


References
1.
Wu S, Alseekh S, Cuadros-Inostroza A, Fusari C, Mutwil M, Kooke R . Combined Use of Genome-Wide Association Data and Correlation Networks Unravels Key Regulators of Primary Metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2016; 12(10):e1006363. PMC: 5070769. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006363. View

2.
Barah P, B N M, Jayavelu N, Sowdhamini R, Shameer K, Bones A . Transcriptional regulatory networks in Arabidopsis thaliana during single and combined stresses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 44(7):3147-64. PMC: 4838348. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1463. View

3.
Segal E, Shapira M, Regev A, Peer D, Botstein D, Koller D . Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat Genet. 2003; 34(2):166-76. DOI: 10.1038/ng1165. View

4.
Needham C, Manfield I, Bulpitt A, Gilmartin P, Westhead D . From gene expression to gene regulatory networks in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Syst Biol. 2009; 3:85. PMC: 2760521. DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-3-85. View

5.
Krouk G, Mirowski P, LeCun Y, Shasha D, Coruzzi G . Predictive network modeling of the high-resolution dynamic plant transcriptome in response to nitrate. Genome Biol. 2010; 11(12):R123. PMC: 3046483. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r123. View