» Articles » PMID: 32547535

Autoimmune Pathology in Myasthenia Gravis Disease Subtypes Is Governed by Divergent Mechanisms of Immunopathology

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2020 Jun 18
PMID 32547535
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a prototypical autoantibody mediated disease. The autoantibodies in MG target structures within the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), thus affecting neuromuscular transmission. The major disease subtypes of autoimmune MG are defined by their antigenic target. The most common target of pathogenic autoantibodies in MG is the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR), followed by muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) and lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4). MG patients present with similar symptoms independent of the underlying subtype of disease, while the immunopathology is remarkably distinct. Here we highlight these distinct immune mechanisms that describe both the B cell- and autoantibody-mediated pathogenesis by comparing AChR and MuSK MG subtypes. In our discussion of the AChR subtype, we focus on the role of long-lived plasma cells in the production of pathogenic autoantibodies, the IgG1 subclass mediated pathology, and contributions of complement. The similarities underlying the immunopathology of AChR MG and neuromyelitis optica (NMO) are highlighted. In contrast, MuSK MG is caused by autoantibody production by short-lived plasmablasts. MuSK MG autoantibodies are mainly of the IgG4 subclass which can undergo Fab-arm exchange (FAE), a process unique to this subclass. In FAE IgG4, molecules can dissociate into two halves and recombine with other half IgG4 molecules resulting in bispecific antibodies. Similarities between MuSK MG and other IgG4-mediated autoimmune diseases, including pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), are highlighted. Finally, the immunological distinctions are emphasized through presentation of biological therapeutics that provide clinical benefit depending on the MG disease subtype.

Citing Articles

Exploring the clinical significance of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody titers, changes, and change rates in Myasthenia Gravis.

Luo L, Zhu X, Wen C, Guo Y, Yang J, Wei D Front Neurol. 2025; 15:1506845.

PMID: 39882373 PMC: 11774727. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1506845.


Efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Yang X, Zhang W, Guo J, Ma C, Li B Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1439899.

PMID: 39385818 PMC: 11461331. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1439899.


Different Patterns of Autoantibody Secretion by Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Autoimmune Nodopathies.

Rohrbacher S, Seefried S, Hartmannsberger B, Annabelle R, Appeltshauser L, Arlt F Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2024; 11(5):e200295.

PMID: 39173087 PMC: 11379437. DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200295.


Efgartigimod as a promising add-on therapy for myasthenic crisis: a prospective case series.

Song J, Wang H, Huan X, Jiang Q, Wu Z, Yan C Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1418503.

PMID: 39136012 PMC: 11317420. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1418503.


Immune mediated myasthenia gravis in children, current concepts and new treatments: A narrative review article.

Tavasoli A Iran J Child Neurol. 2024; 18(3):21-42.

PMID: 38988843 PMC: 11231678. DOI: 10.22037/ijcn.v18i3.45054.


References
1.
Graus Y, De Baets M, Parren P, Berrih-Aknin S, Wokke J, Van Breda Vriesman P . Human anti-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor recombinant Fab fragments isolated from thymus-derived phage display libraries from myasthenia gravis patients reflect predominant specificities in serum and block the action of pathogenic serum antibodies. J Immunol. 1997; 158(4):1919-29. View

2.
Isenberg D, Gordon C, Licu D, Copt S, Rossi C, Wofsy D . Efficacy and safety of atacicept for prevention of flares in patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): 52-week data (APRIL-SLE randomised trial). Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 74(11):2006-15. PMC: 4680140. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205067. View

3.
Lauriola L, Ranelletti F, Maggiano N, Guerriero M, Punzi C, Marsili F . Thymus changes in anti-MuSK-positive and -negative myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2005; 64(3):536-8. DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000150587.71497.B6. View

4.
Teicher B, Ara G, Herbst R, Palombella V, Adams J . The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 in cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 1999; 5(9):2638-45. View

5.
Cole R, Reddel S, Gervasio O, Phillips W . Anti-MuSK patient antibodies disrupt the mouse neuromuscular junction. Ann Neurol. 2008; 63(6):782-9. DOI: 10.1002/ana.21371. View