» Articles » PMID: 32534568

How Does the EQ-5D-5L Perform in Asthma Patients Compared with an Asthma-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire?

Overview
Journal BMC Pulm Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2020 Jun 15
PMID 32534568
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Asthma patients experience impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQL). Interventions are available to improve HRQL. EQ-5D-5L is a common generic tool used to evaluate health interventions. However, there is debate over whether the use of this measure is adequate in asthma patients.

Methods: We used data from 371 asthma patients participating in a pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program from the EPRA randomized controlled trial. We used four time points: T0 randomization, T1 start PR, T2 end PR, T3 3 months follow-up. We calculated floor and ceiling effects, intra-class correlation (ICC), Cohen's d, and regression analysis to measure the sensitivity to changes of EQ-5D-5 L (EQ-5D index and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)) and the disease-specific Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). Furthermore, we estimated the minimally important difference (MID). Based on the Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, we defined three groups: 1. ACT-A (ACT> 19) controlled asthma, 2. ACT-B (14 < ACT≤19) not well-controlled asthma, and 3. ACT-C (ACT≤14) very poorly controlled asthma.

Results: Only the EQ-5D index showed ceiling effects at T2 and T3 (32%). ICC (between T0 and T1) was moderate or good for all measures. Cohen's d at T2 and T3 was better at differentiating between ACT-A and ACT-B than between ACT-B and ACT-C. The EQ-5D index showed moderate effect sizes (0.63-0.75), while AQLQ showed large effect sizes (0.74-1,48). VAS was responsive to pronounced positive and negative ACT changes in every period, and AQLQ mostly to the positive changes, whereas the EQ-5D index was less responsive. We estimated a MID of 0.08 for the EQ-5D index, 12.3 for VAS, and 0.65 for AQLQ.

Conclusion: All presented HRQL tools had good discriminatory power and good reliability. However, EQ-5D-5 L did not react very sensitively to small changes in asthma control. Therefore, we would suggest using supplementary measures in addition to EQ-5D-5 L to evaluate asthma-specific interventions more comprehensively.

Trial Registration: German Clinical Trial Register, DRKS00007740 (date of registration: 05/15/2015), https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00007740. The registration took place prospectively.

Citing Articles

Are EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L Useful Tools to Assess Health Outcomes in Children With Asthma? An Analysis of Child and Parental Carer Reporting.

Zhou W, Herdman M, Yang Z, Wu B, Wang P, Busschbach J Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025; 60(3):e71031.

PMID: 40042135 PMC: 11881216. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.71031.


Validity and Responsiveness of EQ-5D in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Chua A, Cheng L, Soh Z, Chen L, Luo N Patient. 2024; 18(1):35-47.

PMID: 39243353 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00711-9.


Development and linguistic validation of the Korean version of the Severe Asthma Questionnaire.

Kang S, Ahn K, Lee J, Chung S, Sohn K, Park S J Thorac Dis. 2023; 15(6):3172-3181.

PMID: 37426161 PMC: 10323554. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-1415.


Quality of life and healthcare costs of patients with allergic respiratory diseases: a cross-sectional study.

Hillerich V, Valbert F, Neusser S, Pfaar O, Klimek L, Sperl A Eur J Health Econ. 2023; 25(4):579-600.

PMID: 37414970 PMC: 11136789. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01598-3.


Symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with persistent asthma: a cross-sectional analysis of the INSPIRERS studies.

Simoes Cunha M, Amaral R, Pereira A, Almeida R, Alves-Correia M, Loureiro C BMJ Open. 2023; 13(5):e068725.

PMID: 37147092 PMC: 10163458. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068725.


References
1.
Turner S, Eastwood P, Cook A, Jenkins S . Improvements in symptoms and quality of life following exercise training in older adults with moderate/severe persistent asthma. Respiration. 2010; 81(4):302-10. DOI: 10.1159/000315142. View

2.
Weinstein M, Torrance G, McGuire A . QALYs: the basics. Value Health. 2009; 12 Suppl 1:S5-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00515.x. View

3.
McHorney C, TARLOV A . Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?. Qual Life Res. 1995; 4(4):293-307. DOI: 10.1007/BF01593882. View

4.
Szende A, Svensson K, Stahl E, Meszaros A, Berta G . Psychometric and utility-based measures of health status of asthmatic patients with different disease control level. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004; 22(8):537-47. DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200422080-00005. View

5.
Schultz K, Seidl H, Jelusic D, Wagner R, Wittmann M, Faller H . Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with asthma: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (EPRA). BMC Pulm Med. 2017; 17(1):49. PMC: 5343403. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-017-0389-3. View