» Articles » PMID: 32529975

How Many Alcohol-attributable Deaths and Hospital Admissions Could Be Prevented by Alternative Pricing and Taxation Policies? Modelling Impacts on Alcohol Consumption, Revenues and Related Harms in Canada

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Jun 13
PMID 32529975
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In 2017, Canada increased alcohol excise taxes for the first time in over three decades. In this article, we describe a model to estimate various effects of additional tax and price policies that are predicted to improve health outcomes.

Methods: We obtained alcohol sales and taxation data for 2016/17 for all Canadian jurisdictions from Statistics Canada and product-level sales data for British Columbia. We modelled effects of alternative price and tax policies - revenue-neutral taxes, inflation-adjusted taxes and minimum unit prices (MUPs) - on consumption, revenues and harms. We used published price elasticities to estimate impacts on consumption and revenue and the International Model for Alcohol Harms and Policies (InterMAHP) to estimate impacts on alcohol-attributable mortality and morbidity.

Results: Other things being equal, revenue-neutral alcohol volumetric taxes (AVT) would have minimal influence on overall alcohol consumption and related harms. Inflation-adjusted AVT would result in 3.83% less consumption, 329 fewer deaths and 3762 fewer hospital admissions. A MUP of $1.75 per standard drink (equal to 17.05mL ethanol) would have reduced consumption by 8.68% in 2016, which in turn would have reduced the number of deaths by 732 and the number of hospitalizations by 8329 that year. Indexing alcohol excise taxes between 1991/92 and 2016/17 would have resulted in the federal government gaining approximately $10.97 billion. We estimated this could have prevented 4000-5400 deaths and 43 000-56 000 hospitalizations.

Conclusion: Improved public health outcomes would be made possible by (1) increasing alcohol excise tax rates across all beverages to compensate for past failures to index rates, and (2) setting a MUP of at least $1.75 per standard drink. While reducing alcohol-caused harms, these tax policies would have the added benefit of increasing federal government revenues.

Citing Articles

Alcohol-attributable mortality and alcohol control policy in the Baltic Countries and Poland in 2001-2020: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Radisauskas R, Stelemekas M, Petkeviciene J, Trisauske J, Telksnys T, Miscikiene L Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023; 18(1):65.

PMID: 37946282 PMC: 10636906. DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00574-7.


Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol-related hospital outcomes: systematic review.

Maharaj T, Angus C, Fitzgerald N, Allen K, Stewart S, MacHale S BMJ Open. 2023; 13(2):e065220.

PMID: 36737089 PMC: 9900069. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065220.


Public Health Measures and Prevention of Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease.

Ayares G, Idalsoaga F, Arnold J, Fuentes-Lopez E, Arab J, Diaz L J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022; 12(6):1480-1491.

PMID: 36340308 PMC: 9630023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.05.005.


Are Lower-Strength Beers Gateways to Higher-Strength Beers? Time Series Analyses of Household Purchases from 64,280 British Households, 2015-2018.

Llopis E, ODonnell A, Kaner E, Anderson P Alcohol Alcohol. 2022; 57(4):520-528.

PMID: 35512687 PMC: 9270994. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agac025.


[Potential impact of increased alcohol taxes on the alcohol-attributable burden of disease in Germany: a modelling study].

Kilian C, Rovira P, Neufeld M, Manthey J, Rehm J Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022; 65(6):668-676.

PMID: 35441234 PMC: 9132832. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-022-03528-9.


References
1.
Thompson K, Stockwell T, Wettlaufer A, Giesbrecht N, Thomas G . Minimum alcohol pricing policies in practice: A critical examination of implementation in Canada. J Public Health Policy. 2017; 38(1):39-57. DOI: 10.1057/s41271-016-0051-y. View

2.
Meier P, Holmes J, Angus C, Ally A, Meng Y, Brennan A . Estimated Effects of Different Alcohol Taxation and Price Policies on Health Inequalities: A Mathematical Modelling Study. PLoS Med. 2016; 13(2):e1001963. PMC: 4764336. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001963. View

3.
Ally A, Meng Y, Chakraborty R, Dobson P, Seaton J, Holmes J . Alcohol tax pass-through across the product and price range: do retailers treat cheap alcohol differently?. Addiction. 2014; 109(12):1994-2002. DOI: 10.1111/add.12590. View

4.
Byrnes J, Cobiac L, Doran C, Vos T, Shakeshaft A . Cost-effectiveness of volumetric alcohol taxation in Australia. Med J Aust. 2010; 192(8):439-43. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03581.x. View

5.
Nelson T, Xuan Z, Babor T, Brewer R, Chaloupka F, Gruenewald P . Efficacy and the strength of evidence of U.S. alcohol control policies. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 45(1):19-28. PMC: 3708657. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.008. View