How Many Alcohol-attributable Deaths and Hospital Admissions Could Be Prevented by Alternative Pricing and Taxation Policies? Modelling Impacts on Alcohol Consumption, Revenues and Related Harms in Canada
Overview
Affiliations
Introduction: In 2017, Canada increased alcohol excise taxes for the first time in over three decades. In this article, we describe a model to estimate various effects of additional tax and price policies that are predicted to improve health outcomes.
Methods: We obtained alcohol sales and taxation data for 2016/17 for all Canadian jurisdictions from Statistics Canada and product-level sales data for British Columbia. We modelled effects of alternative price and tax policies - revenue-neutral taxes, inflation-adjusted taxes and minimum unit prices (MUPs) - on consumption, revenues and harms. We used published price elasticities to estimate impacts on consumption and revenue and the International Model for Alcohol Harms and Policies (InterMAHP) to estimate impacts on alcohol-attributable mortality and morbidity.
Results: Other things being equal, revenue-neutral alcohol volumetric taxes (AVT) would have minimal influence on overall alcohol consumption and related harms. Inflation-adjusted AVT would result in 3.83% less consumption, 329 fewer deaths and 3762 fewer hospital admissions. A MUP of $1.75 per standard drink (equal to 17.05mL ethanol) would have reduced consumption by 8.68% in 2016, which in turn would have reduced the number of deaths by 732 and the number of hospitalizations by 8329 that year. Indexing alcohol excise taxes between 1991/92 and 2016/17 would have resulted in the federal government gaining approximately $10.97 billion. We estimated this could have prevented 4000-5400 deaths and 43 000-56 000 hospitalizations.
Conclusion: Improved public health outcomes would be made possible by (1) increasing alcohol excise tax rates across all beverages to compensate for past failures to index rates, and (2) setting a MUP of at least $1.75 per standard drink. While reducing alcohol-caused harms, these tax policies would have the added benefit of increasing federal government revenues.
Radisauskas R, Stelemekas M, Petkeviciene J, Trisauske J, Telksnys T, Miscikiene L Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023; 18(1):65.
PMID: 37946282 PMC: 10636906. DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00574-7.
Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol-related hospital outcomes: systematic review.
Maharaj T, Angus C, Fitzgerald N, Allen K, Stewart S, MacHale S BMJ Open. 2023; 13(2):e065220.
PMID: 36737089 PMC: 9900069. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065220.
Public Health Measures and Prevention of Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease.
Ayares G, Idalsoaga F, Arnold J, Fuentes-Lopez E, Arab J, Diaz L J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022; 12(6):1480-1491.
PMID: 36340308 PMC: 9630023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.05.005.
Llopis E, ODonnell A, Kaner E, Anderson P Alcohol Alcohol. 2022; 57(4):520-528.
PMID: 35512687 PMC: 9270994. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agac025.
Kilian C, Rovira P, Neufeld M, Manthey J, Rehm J Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022; 65(6):668-676.
PMID: 35441234 PMC: 9132832. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-022-03528-9.