Efficacy and the Strength of Evidence of U.S. Alcohol Control Policies

Overview

Journal Am J Prev Med

Specialty Public Health

Date 2013 Jun 25

PMID 23790985

Citations 58

Authors

Toben F Nelson

Ziming Xuan

Thomas F Babor

Robert D Brewer

Frank J Chaloupka

Paul J Gruenewald

Harold Holder

Michael Klitzner

James F Mosher

Rebecca L Ramirez

Robert Reynolds

Traci L Toomey

Victoria Churchill

Timothy S Naimi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Public policy can limit alcohol consumption and its associated harm, but no direct comparison of the relative efficacy of alcohol control policies exists for the U.S.

Purpose: To identify alcohol control policies and develop quantitative ratings of their efficacy and strength of evidence.

Methods: In 2010, a Delphi panel of ten U.S. alcohol policy experts identified and rated the efficacy of alcohol control policies for reducing binge drinking and alcohol-impaired driving among both the general population and youth, and the strength of evidence informing the efficacy of each policy. The policies were nominated on the basis of scientific evidence and potential for public health impact. Analysis was conducted in 2010-2012.

Results: Panelists identified and rated 47 policies. Policies limiting price received the highest ratings, with alcohol taxes receiving the highest ratings for all four outcomes. Highly rated policies for reducing binge drinking and alcohol-impaired driving in the general population also were rated highly among youth, although several policies were rated more highly for youth compared with the general population. Policy efficacy ratings for the general population and youth were positively correlated for reducing both binge drinking (r=0.50) and alcohol-impaired driving (r=0.45). The correlation between efficacy ratings for reducing binge drinking and alcohol-impaired driving was strong for the general population (r=0.88) and for youth (r=0.85). Efficacy ratings were positively correlated with strength-of-evidence ratings.

Conclusions: Comparative policy ratings can help characterize the alcohol policy environment, inform policy discussions, and identify future research needs.

Citing Articles

One in three or three in one: Integrating three competing theoretical models (TPB, VIP, and PADM) to explain the intentions to act/actions against climate change.

Kim M, Kim S, Jeon S Heliyon. 2024; 10(21):e39337.

PMID: 39553624 PMC: 11565018. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39337.

Associations between state-level general population alcohol policies and drinking outcomes among women of reproductive age: Results from 1984 to 2020 National Alcohol Surveys.

Subbaraman M, Sesline K, Kerr W, Roberts S Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023; 47(9):1773-1782.

PMID: 38051149 PMC: 10849058. DOI: 10.1111/acer.15156.

Alcohol policy framing in South Africa during the early stages of COVID-19: using extraordinary times to make an argument for a new normal.

Bartlett A, Lesch M, Golder S, McCambridge J BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):1877.

PMID: 37770857 PMC: 10537160. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16512-y.

Qualitative study of states' capacity to support alcohol prevention policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.

Haley S, Peddireddy S, El-Harakeh A, Akasreku B, Riibe D Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023; 42(6):1358-1374.

PMID: 37452762 PMC: 11002955. DOI: 10.1111/dar.13714.

Micro-temporal analyses of crime related to alcohol outlets: A comparison of outcomes over weekday, weekend, daytime and nighttime hours.

Gruenewald P, Sumetsky N, Mair C, Lee J, Ponicki W Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023; 42(4):902-911.

PMID: 36989160 PMC: 10273326. DOI: 10.1111/dar.13644.

References

Wagenaar A, Toomey T . Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002; (14):206-25. DOI: 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.206. View

Fell J, Fisher D, Voas R, Blackman K, Tippetts A . The relationship of underage drinking laws to reductions in drinking drivers in fatal crashes in the United States. Accid Anal Prev. 2008; 40(4):1430-40. PMC: 2526462. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.03.006. View

Ritter A . Comparing alcohol policies between countries: science or silliness?. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(4):e153. PMC: 1876416. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040153. View

Nelson T, Weitzman E, Wechsler H . The effect of a campus-community environmental alcohol prevention initiative on student drinking and driving: results from the "a matter of degree" program evaluation. Traffic Inj Prev. 2005; 6(4):323-30. DOI: 10.1080/15389580500253778. View

Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J . Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet. 2009; 373(9682):2223-33. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60746-7. View

. Vital signs: binge drinking prevalence, frequency, and intensity among adults - United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61(1):14-9. View

Wagenaar A, Toomey T, Murray D, Short B, Wolfson M, Jones-Webb R . Sources of alcohol for underage drinkers. J Stud Alcohol. 1996; 57(3):325-33. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1996.57.325. View

Mokdad A, Marks J, Stroup D, Gerberding J . Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004; 291(10):1238-45. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1238. View

Wagenaar A, Tobler A, Komro K . Effects of alcohol tax and price policies on morbidity and mortality: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(11):2270-8. PMC: 2951962. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.186007. View

10.

. Vital signs: alcohol-impaired driving among adults--United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011; 60(39):1351-6. View

11.

Room R, Babor T, Rehm J . Alcohol and public health. Lancet. 2005; 365(9458):519-30. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17870-2. View

12.

Wagenaar A, Salois M, Komro K . Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: a meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. Addiction. 2009; 104(2):179-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02438.x. View

13.

Klingemann H, Holder H, Gutzwiller F . Research on and prevention of alcohol-related trauma: phases, patterns, and issues. Addiction. 1993; 88(7):861-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02103.x. View

14.

Babor T . Linking science to policy. The role of international collaborative research. Alcohol Res Health. 2002; 26(1):66-74. PMC: 6683804. View

15.

Nelson D, Naimi T, Brewer R, Nelson H . State alcohol-use estimates among youth and adults, 1993-2005. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(3):218-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.10.018. View

16.

Wechsler H, NELSON T . Binge drinking and the American college student: what's five drinks?. Psychol Addict Behav. 2002; 15(4):287-91. DOI: 10.1037//0893-164x.15.4.287. View

17.

Naimi T, Nelson D, Brewer R . Driving after binge drinking. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37(4):314-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.013. View

18.

Paschall M, Grube J, Kypri K . Alcohol control policies and alcohol consumption by youth: a multi-national study. Addiction. 2009; 104(11):1849-55. PMC: 2763342. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02698.x. View

19.

Bouchery E, Harwood H, Sacks J, Simon C, Brewer R . Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 41(5):516-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.045. View

20.

Bergen G, Shults R, Beck L, Qayad M . Self-reported alcohol-impaired driving in the U.S., 2006 and 2008. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(2):142-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.015. View