» Articles » PMID: 32525556

Impact of Local Control and Surgical Lymph Node Evaluation in Localized Paratesticular Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee

Overview
Journal Int J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2020 Jun 12
PMID 32525556
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (PT-RMS) carries a favorable prognosis, but questions persist regarding optimal management. Our goal was to determine the importance of primary tumor resection and surgical assessment of retroperitoneal lymph nodes during staging in patients with PT-RMS. We analyzed patients with localized PT-RMS enrolled onto one of four Children's Oncology Group studies (D9602, ARST0331, D9803 or ARST0531). Surgical resection of the primary tumor prior to chemotherapy and radiotherapy was encouraged when possible with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) recommended for patients ≥10 years of age. Among 279 patients (median 8.1 years old), most tumors were resected with negative margins (78.5%) and most patients did not have radiographic enlargement of regional lymph nodes (90.3%). In patients older than 10 years, imaging alone will miss over 51.5% of nodal disease. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) was 92.0% (95% CI 88.4%-95.6%). Sampling ≥7 to 12 retroperitoneal lymph nodes appeared optimal for detecting positive nodes; while there was a trend toward improved EFS among those undergoing template RPLND, this was not statistically significant (P = .068). Age (P = .28), N-stage (P = .39), T-stage (P = .11) and pathologic node involvement (P = .53) were not associated with overall survival. However, older age and larger tumor size had an additive impact on EFS (P = .027) though not overall survival (P = .13). In conclusion, outcomes for patients with PT-RMS are excellent. Reliance on imaging to detect nodal involvement will miss pathologic node involvement and may result in undertreatment. Surgical nodal staging requires at least 7 to 12 nodes to accurately identify patients with regional nodal disease.

Citing Articles

The Other Site of Rhabdomyosarcoma.

Kern L, Henssen A, Eggert A, Scheer M Cancer Med. 2024; 13(20):e70348.

PMID: 39463067 PMC: 11513437. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70348.


Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcomas of the Genitourinary Tract.

Castle J, Levy B, Allison D, Rodeberg D, Rellinger E Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(10).

PMID: 37345202 PMC: 10216134. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102864.


Fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcoma with diffuse bony metastases and remarkable chemosensitivity.

Kube P, Parisio K, Mangum D, Powell J BMJ Case Rep. 2022; 15(8).

PMID: 36038153 PMC: 9438076. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2022-250236.


International Society of Paediatric Surgical Oncology (IPSO) Surgical Practice Guidelines.

Abib S, Chui C, Cox S, Abdelhafeez A, Fernandez-Pineda I, Elgendy A Ecancermedicalscience. 2022; 16:1356.

PMID: 35510137 PMC: 9023308. DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1356.


Clinical group and modified TNM stage for rhabdomyosarcoma: A review from the Children's Oncology Group.

Crane J, Xue W, Qumseya A, Gao Z, Arndt C, Donaldson S Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022; 69(6):e29644.

PMID: 35253352 PMC: 9233945. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29644.


References
1.
Rogers T, Minard-Colin V, Cozic N, Jenney M, Merks J, Gallego S . Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma in children and adolescents-Outcome and patterns of relapse when utilizing a nonsurgical strategy for lymph node staging: Report from the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) Malignant Mesenchymal.... Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017; 64(9). DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26486. View

2.
Raney R, Walterhouse D, Meza J, Andrassy R, Breneman J, Crist W . Results of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group D9602 protocol, using vincristine and dactinomycin with or without cyclophosphamide and radiation therapy, for newly diagnosed patients with low-risk embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from.... J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(10):1312-8. PMC: 3083999. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.4469. View

3.
Cecchetto G, Grotto P, De Bernardi B, Indolfi P, Perilongo G, Carli M . Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma in childhood: experience of the Italian Cooperative Study. Tumori. 1988; 74(6):645-7. DOI: 10.1177/030089168807400605. View

4.
Stevens M, Rey A, Bouvet N, Ellershaw C, Flamant F, Habrand J . Treatment of nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma in childhood and adolescence: third study of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology--SIOP Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor 89. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(12):2618-28. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.130. View

5.
Alanee S, Holland B, Dynda D, Kamel O, Ganai S . Primary tumor size predicts pathologic findings in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes in patients with paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma. Virchows Arch. 2014; 465(6):697-701. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1663-x. View