» Articles » PMID: 32514487

Assessing the Performance of Dried-Blood-Spot DNA Extraction Methods in Next Generation Sequencing

Overview
Date 2020 Jun 10
PMID 32514487
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An increasing number of newborn screening laboratories in the United States and abroad are moving towards incorporating next-generation sequencing technology, or NGS, into routine screening, particularly for cystic fibrosis. As more programs utilize this technology for both cystic fibrosis and beyond, it is critical to identify appropriate DNA extraction methods that can be used with dried blood spots that will result in consistent, high-quality sequencing results. To provide comprehensive quality assurance and technical assistance to newborn screening laboratories wishing to incorporate NGS assays, CDC's Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch designed a study to evaluate the performance of nine commercial or laboratory-developed DNA extraction methods that range from a highly purified column extraction to a crude detergent-based no-wash boil prep. The DNA from these nine methods was used in two NGS library preparations that interrogate the gene. All DNA extraction methods including the cruder preps performed reasonably well with both library preps. One lower-concentration, older sample was excluded from one of the assay evaluations due to poor performance across all DNA extraction methods. When 84 samples, versus eight, were run on a flow cell, the DNA quality and quantity were more significant variables.

Citing Articles

Optimization of Total DNA Extraction from Dried Blood Samples.

Samsonova J, Saushkin N, Voronkova V, Stolpovsky Y, Piskunov A Biochem Genet. 2024; .

PMID: 38995529 DOI: 10.1007/s10528-024-10882-7.


Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).

Therrell B, Padilla C, Borrajo G, Khneisser I, Schielen P, Knight-Madden J Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024; 10(2).

PMID: 38920845 PMC: 11203842. DOI: 10.3390/ijns10020038.


A Comprehensive, Targeted NGS Approach to Assessing Molecular Diagnosis of Lysosomal Storage Diseases.

La Cognata V, Cavallaro S Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(11).

PMID: 34828358 PMC: 8617937. DOI: 10.3390/genes12111750.


Design and Validation of a Custom NGS Panel Targeting a Set of Lysosomal Storage Diseases Candidate for NBS Applications.

La Cognata V, Guarnaccia M, Morello G, Ruggieri M, Polizzi A, Cavallaro S Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(18).

PMID: 34576242 PMC: 8470217. DOI: 10.3390/ijms221810064.


Next-Generation Sequencing in Newborn Screening: A Review of Current State.

Remec Z, Trebusak Podkrajsek K, Repic Lampret B, Kovac J, Groselj U, Tesovnik T Front Genet. 2021; 12:662254.

PMID: 34122514 PMC: 8188483. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.662254.

References
1.
Liu X, Han S, Wang Z, Gelernter J, Yang B . Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9):e75619. PMC: 3785481. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075619. View

2.
De Jesus V, Mei J, Cordovado S, Cuthbert C . The Newborn Screening Quality Assurance Program at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Thirty-five Year Experience Assuring Newborn Screening Laboratory Quality. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2015; 1(1):13-26. PMC: 4545740. DOI: 10.3390/ijns1010013. View

3.
Pratt V, Caggana M, Bridges C, Buller A, DiAntonio L, Highsmith W . Development of genomic reference materials for cystic fibrosis genetic testing. J Mol Diagn. 2009; 11(3):186-93. PMC: 2671335. DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080149. View

4.
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A . The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010; 20(9):1297-303. PMC: 2928508. DOI: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. View

5.
Baker M, Groose M, Hoffman G, Rock M, Levy H, Farrell P . Optimal DNA tier for the IRT/DNA algorithm determined by CFTR mutation results over 14 years of newborn screening. J Cyst Fibros. 2011; 10(4):278-81. PMC: 3650906. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.02.001. View