» Articles » PMID: 32499863

Clinical Outcomes of Intermediate-Length Cephalomedullary Nails for Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Repair in Older Adults

Overview
Journal Kans J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Jun 6
PMID 32499863
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Hip fracture is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. Intertrochanteric hip fractures often are treated surgically using cephalomedullary nails (CMN), in either a short or long length. Their outcomes are documented in the literature; however, outcomes of the intermediate-length CMN have not been well described.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of older adults with intertrochanteric hip fractures that were treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation using an intermediate-length (235 mm Synthes Trochanteric Fixation nail or 240 mm Stryker Gamma 3) nail. Outcome data were collected during the inpatient stay and 16 months post-operatively.

Results: Seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria and were reviewed during inpatient stay; however, only 42 had documented post-operative outcomes. Of those, two patients died post-discharge and were not included in the 16-month follow-up. Comparison of results to published literature suggested that intermediate-length nails are comparable to short-length nails with regard to time in the operating room and estimated blood loss. The rate of blood transfusion was lower and length of hospital stay was shorter than in comparable studies of both short- and long-length nails. There were no post-operative peri-prosthetic fractures in the 16-month follow-up. This rate was lower than published rates for short and long nails. The hardware failure rate (3/42, 7.1%) of intermediate-length nails was higher than comparison studies of both short- and long-length nails.

Conclusion: Patient outcomes for intermediate-length nails were similar to outcomes of shorter length nails. Utilization of the intermediate-length nail appears to be an effective treatment option for repair of intertrochanteric femur fractures. However, direct comparison is difficult since peri-prosthetic fracture rate may increase over time and nail length and hardware failure are not defined consistently in the literature. Further study is needed with a larger sample size followed over a longer period of time to confirm our findings.

Citing Articles

Assessing potential factors leading to perioperative peri-implant fracture in femoral pertrochanteric fracture osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation 2: A retrospective study.

Yang J, Hsu Y, Chou Y, Tsai P, Liu C, Yu Y BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):943.

PMID: 39574062 PMC: 11580694. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08085-7.


Geriatric proximal femur fracture updates.

Giordano V, Woolley P, Heetveld M, Smith C, de Ridder V OTA Int. 2024; 7(3 Suppl):e323.

PMID: 38708041 PMC: 11064807. DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000323.


Comparison of Short, Intermediate, and Long Cephalomedullary Nail Length Outcomes in Elderly Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures.

Womble T, Kirk A, Boyle M, Comadoll S, Su L, Srinath A J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022; 6(3).

PMID: 35245250 PMC: 8893295. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00322.


X-Ray Film under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm in the Evaluation for Nursing Effect of Gamma Nail Internal Fixation in Elderly Patients with Intertrochanteric Fracture of Femur.

Wang Y, Wang X, Jin L, Wei X Comput Math Methods Med. 2021; 2021:2562575.

PMID: 34887939 PMC: 8651362. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2562575.

References
1.
Robinson C, Adams C, Craig M, Doward W, Clarke M, Auld J . Implant-related fractures of the femur following hip fracture surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(7):1116-22. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200207000-00004. View

2.
Bhandari M, Schemitsch E, Jonsson A, Zlowodzki M, Haidukewych G . Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009; 23(6):460-4. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318162f67f. View

3.
Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis J . World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 1997; 7(5):407-13. DOI: 10.1007/pl00004148. View

4.
Norris R, Bhattacharjee D, Parker M . Occurrence of secondary fracture around intramedullary nails used for trochanteric hip fractures: a systematic review of 13,568 patients. Injury. 2011; 43(6):706-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.027. View

5.
Kim S, Meehan J, Blumenfeld T, Szabo R . Hip fractures in the United States: 2008 nationwide emergency department sample. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011; 64(5):751-7. DOI: 10.1002/acr.21580. View