Implant-Related Complications and Mortality After Use of Short or Long Gamma Nail for Intertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures: A Prospective Study with Minimum 13-Year Follow-up

Overview

Journal JB JS Open Access

Date 2018 Sep 20

PMID 30229225

Citations 18

Authors

Nolan S Horner

Kristian Samuelsson

Janos Solyom

Kristian Bjorgul

Olufemi R Ayeni

Bengt Ostman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rates of implant-related complications and mortality after treatment of an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture with a short or long Gamma nail.

Methods: Between September 1998 and August 2003, 644 patients at 2 centers treated with a long or short Gamma nail for a hip fracture were prospectively enrolled in this study. These patients were followed until they reached 1 of the study end points, which included death, a reoperation directly related to the Gamma nail, or the end date of the study.

Results: The average age (and standard deviation) of the patients included in the study was 81.3 ± 8.6 years at the time of the operation, and 28.3% of the patients were male. The rate of implant-related complications was 9.9%. The most common complications included peri-implant fracture (4.2%), proximal lateral thigh discomfort requiring extraction of the implant (2.0%), and lag-screw cutout (1.1%). Interestingly, more than half (56%) of the 27 peri-implant fractures occurred >1.5 years after the index operation. The median time from the operation to death was 2.9 years (range, 0 to 17.1 years). The 30-day mortality rate after treatment was 9.5%. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class-3 or 4 physical status had a significantly higher risk of mortality than ASA class-1 patients.

Conclusions: Gamma nails are effective in the treatment of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. However, 9.8% of patients had complications requiring additional surgery. The most common serious complications include peri-implant fracture and lag-screw cutout. Several peri-implant fractures occurred long after the index procedure. Patients had a high rate of mortality (27%) after 1 year, and higher preoperative ASA class was found to be a predictor of increased risk of mortality. Therefore, clinicians must carefully consider patients' preoperative comorbidities when counselling patients on the risks of surgery.

Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Initial construct stability of long cephalomedullary nails with superior locking for a complex trochanteric fracture model AO31A2.2- a biomechanical study.

Schulz A, Munch M, Barth T, Kowald B, Frese J, Behrends L J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):728.

PMID: 39506795 PMC: 11542236. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05079-y.

What is the Optimal Nail Length to Treat Osteoporotic Subtrochanteric Fractures? A Finite Element Analysis.

Je D, Kim J, Lee S, Kim C Clin Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(3):363-373.

PMID: 38827761 PMC: 11130630. DOI: 10.4055/cios23234.

Risk Factors for Therapeutic Failure and One-Year Mortality in Patients with Intramedullary Nail-Associated Infection after Trochanteric and Subtrochanteric Hip Fracture Repair.

Pfang B, Villegas Garcia M, Garcia A, Aunon Rubio A, Esteban J, Garcia Canete J Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38786191 PMC: 11118869. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13050463.

Effect of Postoperative Non-Weight-Bearing in Trochanteric Fracture of the Femur: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Propensity Score Matching.

Takemoto N, Yoshitani J, Saiki Y, Numata H, Nambu K Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2023; 14:21514593231160916.

PMID: 36875966 PMC: 9974619. DOI: 10.1177/21514593231160916.

Subtrochanteric femoral fractures: A case series of 194 patients treated with long and short intramedullary nails.

Jannelli E, Ghia C, Marta M, Pasta G, Ivone A, Boggio E Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022; 14(6):38613.

PMID: 36267212 PMC: 9568424. DOI: 10.52965/001c.38613.

References

Liu M, Yang Z, Pei F, Huang F, Chen S, Xiang Z . A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2009; 34(3):323-8. PMC: 2899291. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0783-4. View

Albareda J, Laderiga A, Palanca D, Paniagua L, Seral F . Complications and technical problems with the gamma nail. Int Orthop. 1996; 20(1):47-50. DOI: 10.1007/s002640050026. View

Caiaffa V, Vicenti G, Mori C, Panella A, Conserva V, Corina G . Is distal locking with short intramedullary nails necessary in stable pertrochanteric fractures? A prospective, multicentre, randomised study. Injury. 2016; 47 Suppl 4:S98-S106. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.038. View

Bhandari M, Schemitsch E, Jonsson A, Zlowodzki M, Haidukewych G . Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009; 23(6):460-4. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318162f67f. View

Hesse B, Gachter A . Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004; 124(10):692-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-004-0744-8. View

Krigbaum H, Takemoto S, Kim H, Kuo A . Costs and Complications of Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of OTA 31-A2 Proximal Femur Fractures in U.S. Veterans. J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 30(3):125-9. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000521. View

Gjertsen J, Engesaeter L, Furnes O, Havelin L, Steindal K, Vinje T . The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register: experiences after the first 2 years and 15,576 reported operations. Acta Orthop. 2008; 79(5):583-93. DOI: 10.1080/17453670810016588. View

Bong M, Kummer F, Koval K, Egol K . Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: biomechanics and biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007; 15(2):97-106. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200702000-00004. View

Bridle S, Patel A, Bircher M, Calvert P . Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(2):330-4. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B2.2005167. View

10.

Fox K, Hawkes W, Hebel J, Felsenthal G, Clark M, Zimmerman S . Mobility after hip fracture predicts health outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998; 46(2):169-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02534.x. View

11.

Bojan A, Beimel C, Speitling A, Taglang G, Ekholm C, Jonsson A . 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11:133. PMC: 2906434. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-133. View

12.

Sagi H, Donohue D, Cooper S, Barei D, Siebler J, Archdeacon M . Institutional and Seasonal Variations in the Incidence and Causative Organisms for Posttraumatic Infection following Open Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 31(2):78-84. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000730. View

13.

. Accelerated care versus standard care among patients with hip fracture: the HIP ATTACK pilot trial. CMAJ. 2013; 186(1):E52-60. PMC: 3883849. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.130901. View

14.

Gallagher D, Adams B, El-Gendi H, Patel A, Grossman L, Berdia J . Is distal locking necessary? A biomechanical investigation of intramedullary nailing constructs for intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012; 27(7):373-8. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31827cd5bd. View

15.

Chua I, Rajamoney G, Kwek E . Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013; 21(3):308-12. DOI: 10.1177/230949901302100309. View

16.

Hossain M, Neelapala V, Andrew J . Results of non-operative treatment following hip fracture compared to surgical intervention. Injury. 2009; 40(4):418-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.10.001. View

17.

Johnell O, Kanis J . An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2004; 15(11):897-902. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1627-0. View

18.

Bjorgul K, Novicoff W, Saleh K . American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status score may be used as a comorbidity index in hip fracture surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(6 Suppl):134-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.010. View

19.

Bojan A, Beimel C, Taglang G, Collin D, Ekholm C, Jonsson A . Critical factors in cut-out complication after Gamma Nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013; 14:1. PMC: 3543839. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-1. View

20.

Boone C, Carlberg K, Koueiter D, Baker K, Sadowski J, Wiater P . Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2). J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(5):e96-e100. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182a7131c. View