» Articles » PMID: 32489596

Competition with Insectivorous Ants As a Contributor to Low Songbird Diversity at Low Elevations in the Eastern Himalaya

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2020 Jun 4
PMID 32489596
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Competitive interactions between distantly related clades could cause complementary diversity patterns of these clades over large spatial scales. One such example might be ants and birds in the eastern Himalaya; ants are very common at low elevations but almost absent at mid-elevations where the abundance of other arthropods and insectivorous bird diversity peaks. Here, we ask if ants at low elevations could compete with birds for arthropod prey. Specifically, we studied the impact of the Asian weaver ant (), a common aggressive ant at low elevations. Diet analysis using molecular methods demonstrate extensive diet overlap between weaver ants and songbirds at both low and mid-elevations. Trees without weaver ants have greater non-ant arthropod abundance and leaf damage. Experimental removal of weaver ants results in an increase in the abundance of non-ant arthropods. Notably, numbers of Coleoptera and Lepidoptera were most affected by removal experiments and were prominent components of both bird and weaver ant diets. Our results suggest that songbirds and weaver ants might potentially compete with each other for arthropod prey at low elevations, thereby contributing to lower insectivorous bird diversity at low elevations in eastern Himalaya. Competition with ants may shape vertebrate diversity patterns across broad biodiversity gradients.

Citing Articles

Intraspecific trait variability and community assembly in hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: ) across an elevational gradient in the eastern Himalayas, India.

Mungee M, Athreya R Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(6):2471-2487.

PMID: 33767815 PMC: 7981230. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7054.


Competition with insectivorous ants as a contributor to low songbird diversity at low elevations in the eastern Himalaya.

Supriya K, Price T, Moreau C Ecol Evol. 2020; 10(10):4280-4290.

PMID: 32489596 PMC: 7246197. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6196.

References
1.
Rosumek F, Silveira F, de S Neves F, de U Barbosa N, Diniz L, Oki Y . Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses. Oecologia. 2009; 160(3):537-49. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1309-x. View

2.
Callahan B, McMurdie P, Rosen M, Han A, Johnson A, Holmes S . DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016; 13(7):581-3. PMC: 4927377. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. View

3.
Pompanon F, Deagle B, Symondson W, Brown D, Jarman S, Taberlet P . Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing. Mol Ecol. 2011; 21(8):1931-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05403.x. View

4.
Emerson B, Kolm N . Species diversity can drive speciation. Nature. 2005; 434(7036):1015-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature03450. View

5.
Brown J, Davidson D . Competition between seed-eating rodents and ants in desert ecosystems. Science. 1977; 196(4292):880-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.196.4292.880. View